Isocaloric restriction normalizes body weight but not relative adiposity, adipose inflammation, or gut microbial diversity in high-fat diet-fed mice

Background/Objectives: The separate contributions of excess energy intake and diet composition to high-fat diet (HFD)-induced adiposity, adipose inflammation, and gut microbial changes are unclear. We tested whether restricting HFD intake to the energy intake of low-fat (LF)-fed mice (isocaloric restriction) prevents or reverses these outcomes. Subjects/Methods: Male C57BL/6 mice (n = 8/group) received for 12 weeks an LF diet (LF/LF) or HFD (HF/HF) ad libitum, HFD ad libitum then isocaloric HFD from week 7 (HF/IHF), or isocaloric HFD throughout (IHF/IHF). Adiposity, plasma markers, adipose and ileal gene expression, and fecal microbiota (16S rRNA sequencing, n = 4/group) were assessed. Results: Final body weight in IHF/IHF did not differ from LF/LF (difference 0.1 g, 95% CI -6.5 to 6.7; P > 0.99) and was lower than in HF/HF (-8.2 g, -14.7 to -1.6; P = 0.011). Switching to isocaloric feeding reduced weight gain during weeks 6-12 (HF/IHF vs HF/HF, -6.4 g, -9.8 to -3.1; P < 0.001). IHF/IHF mice had lower glucose (P = 0.031) and cholesterol (P = 0.005) than HF/HF mice. However, visceral fat relative to body weight remained higher than in LF/LF in IHF/IHF (+1.5 percentage points, 0.04 to 2.9; P = 0.042) and HF/IHF (+1.8, 0.4 to 3.3; P = 0.008). Adipose Tnf expression remained elevated in HF/IHF (log2 difference 2.2, 0.2 to 4.2; P = 0.025), and fecal phylogenetic diversity was lower in IHF/IHF than in LF/LF (Faith's PD -3.1, -5.9 to -0.4; P = 0.024). Ileal barrier genes and plasma lipopolysaccharide-binding protein were unchanged. Conclusions: Limiting HFD energy intake normalized body weight, glycemia, and plasma lipids but not relative adiposity, adipose Tnf expression, or the loss of gut microbial diversity. Diet composition affects these outcomes independently of energy intake, so normal body weight does not indicate their reversal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.23.761336
Primary Topic
Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Isocaloric restriction normalizes body weight but not relative adiposity, adipose inflammation, or gut microbial diversity in high-fat diet-fed mice

Sunhye Lee, Sungjin Eun, Eunji Jeong, Seoyeon Chae
1 links
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
preprint

Isocaloric restriction normalizes body weight but not relative adiposity, adipose inflammation, or gut microbial diversity in high-fat diet-fed mice

Sunhye Lee, Sungjin Eun, Eunji Jeong, Seoyeon Chae
preprint en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The separate contributions of excess energy intake and diet composition to high-fat diet (HFD)-induced adiposity, adipose inflammation, and gut microbial changes are unclear. We tested whether restricting HFD intake to the energy intake of low-fat (LF)-fed mice (isocaloric restriction) prevents or reverses these outcomes. Subjects/Methods: Male C57BL/6 mice (n = 8/group) received for 12 weeks an LF diet (LF/LF) or HFD (HF/HF) ad libitum, HFD ad libitum then isocaloric HFD from week 7 (HF/IHF), or isocaloric HFD throughout (IHF/IHF). Adiposity, plasma markers, adipose and ileal gene expression, and fecal microbiota (16S rRNA sequencing, n = 4/group) were assessed. Results: Final body weight in IHF/IHF did not differ from LF/LF (difference 0.1 g, 95% CI -6.5 to 6.7; P > 0.99) and was lower than in HF/HF (-8.2 g, -14.7 to -1.6; P = 0.011). Switching to isocaloric feeding reduced weight gain during weeks 6-12 (HF/IHF vs HF/HF, -6.4 g, -9.8 to -3.1; P < 0.001). IHF/IHF mice had lower glucose (P = 0.031) and cholesterol (P = 0.005) than HF/HF mice. However, visceral fat relative to body weight remained higher than in LF/LF in IHF/IHF (+1.5 percentage points, 0.04 to 2.9; P = 0.042) and HF/IHF (+1.8, 0.4 to 3.3; P = 0.008). Adipose Tnf expression remained elevated in HF/IHF (log2 difference 2.2, 0.2 to 4.2; P = 0.025), and fecal phylogenetic diversity was lower in IHF/IHF than in LF/LF (Faith's PD -3.1, -5.9 to -0.4; P = 0.024). Ileal barrier genes and plasma lipopolysaccharide-binding protein were unchanged. Conclusions: Limiting HFD energy intake normalized body weight, glycemia, and plasma lipids but not relative adiposity, adipose Tnf expression, or the loss of gut microbial diversity. Diet composition affects these outcomes independently of energy intake, so normal body weight does not indicate their reversal.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Sun Moon University (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Good health and well-being
Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon