Ostomy Assessment Systematic Integration of Studies (OASIS): Physical Assessment Scoping Review

Background: Individuals living with an ostomy experience multiple physical changes that require ongoing assessment. While physical assessment remains vital for those living with an ostomy, synthesized data identifying assessment practices and outcomes are lacking. This review, part of the OASIS review, which sought to identify the extent of current literature on assessing individuals living with an ostomy, synthesizes what is known about physical assessment in this population. Methods: This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) methodology. We searched the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases without filters or date restrictions. Data collection occurred in January 2021. We analyzed data using qualitative content analysis and synthesized outcomes using the PAGER Framework to identify patterns, advances, gaps, evidence,and recommendations. Results: This review included 74 studies published between 1951 and 2021. Most studies were retrospective in design. Themes in the data included demographics, stoma and peristomal assessment, stoma pouching systems, medical conditions and surgical risk, specialist support and knowledge for physical assessment, and diet and output. Conclusions: Individualized holistic assessment is needed for those individuals living with an ostomy. Assessment should incorporate physical factors beyond the stoma alone, such as nutrition, hydration, and functional considerations. Standardized assessment frameworks and further research on assessment factors and outcomes are needed to enhance evidence-informed practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63354/cjwoc.v2i2.18164
Primary Topic
Stoma care and complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ostomy Assessment Systematic Integration of Studies (OASIS): Physical Assessment Scoping Review

Samantha Wiesenfeld, Corey Heerschap, Ervis Musa, Britney Butt et al.
2 links
Canadian Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence
Stoma care and complications
article

Ostomy Assessment Systematic Integration of Studies (OASIS): Physical Assessment Scoping Review

Samantha Wiesenfeld, Corey Heerschap, Ervis Musa, Britney Butt, Fiona Hughes, Ella M. Bisset‐Cavallin, Matthew Karasmanis, Kiana McCauley, Ryan Khosrovaneh, Daniel Franco, Gavin Hughes, Angela Luan
article en

Abstract

Background: Individuals living with an ostomy experience multiple physical changes that require ongoing assessment. While physical assessment remains vital for those living with an ostomy, synthesized data identifying assessment practices and outcomes are lacking. This review, part of the OASIS review, which sought to identify the extent of current literature on assessing individuals living with an ostomy, synthesizes what is known about physical assessment in this population. Methods: This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) methodology. We searched the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases without filters or date restrictions. Data collection occurred in January 2021. We analyzed data using qualitative content analysis and synthesized outcomes using the PAGER Framework to identify patterns, advances, gaps, evidence,and recommendations. Results: This review included 74 studies published between 1951 and 2021. Most studies were retrospective in design. Themes in the data included demographics, stoma and peristomal assessment, stoma pouching systems, medical conditions and surgical risk, specialist support and knowledge for physical assessment, and diet and output. Conclusions: Individualized holistic assessment is needed for those individuals living with an ostomy. Assessment should incorporate physical factors beyond the stoma alone, such as nutrition, hydration, and functional considerations. Standardized assessment frameworks and further research on assessment factors and outcomes are needed to enhance evidence-informed practice.

Canadian Journal of Wound Ostomy and ContinenceVol. 2(2)
University of Ottawa (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Queen's University (CA), Georgian College (CA), Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre (CA), Keck Hospital of USC (US), Montreal General Hospital (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Nurses Specialized in Wound, Ostomy and Continence Canada (CA), University of Guelph (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Stoma care and complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon