Concordance between otolaryngologic surgical procedures booked by PAs and procedures ultimately performed
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the concordance between otolaryngologic surgical procedures recommended by physician associates (PAs) and those ultimately performed by surgeons across multiple academic medical centers. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted across three clinical sites from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. Cases were included if a PA recommended surgery and an operative report was available. Concordance was classified as full, partial, or none. Chi-square and Spearman correlation analyses were used to assess associations with clinical site, PAs' estimated years of experience, patient age, and patient diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 1,595 cases booked by 16 PAs, 95.9% were fully concordant. Concordance varied by clinical site and individual PA and was positively correlated with PAs' estimated years of experience (ρ = .103; P < .001). CONCLUSION: PAs demonstrated high concordance in surgical case booking across multiple academic medical centers. These findings support PA participation in team-based preoperative surgical planning and suggest potential benefits to surgical workflows and access to otolaryngologic care.
Authors
- Tiffany Heikel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9939-0819)
- David A. Scalzitti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1617-1053)
- Howard J. Ritz
- Reagan Davis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6839-8930)
- Daniel R. Tierney
- Erin Groft
Institutions
- George Washington University (US)
- The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
- Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JAAPA
- Published
- 2026-10-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jaa.0000000000000427
- Primary Topic
- Nursing Roles and Practices
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00