Automated facial analysis for working dog fatigue assessment
Working dogs perform safety-critical tasks, yet field fatigue assessment relies on subjective handler observation or invasive, impractical instrumentation. We present a non-invasive, video-only framework that extracts 46 anatomically grounded (DogFACS-based) facial landmarks from short recordings and produces fatigue assessment. Unlike wearable physiological monitoring, it attaches nothing to the animal; unlike manual DogFACS coding, it is automated and scalable; and unlike raw-video deep learning, it uses a compact, interpretable representation robust to coat color and lighting and suited to small field datasets. Landmark trajectories were classified by a nested model-selection pipeline spanning tree-based models and deep sequence models. On 177 videos from four working dogs recorded under field conditions, the pipeline reached mean F1-scores of 0.781 for tree-based models and 0.789 for neural-network models in dog-specific nested cross-validation, and 0.676 and 0.740, respectively, under nested leave-one-dog-out validation. We also introduce a dog-specific Relative Facial-State Index, giving strong held-out before–after discrimination in three dogs, and a mouth-motion analysis whose aperture-magnitude features discriminated within all four dogs. To our knowledge, this is the first automated facial-landmark approach to working-dog fatigue assessment under operational conditions, motivating validation in larger, more diverse cohorts.
Authors
- Dan Grinstein
- Anna Zamansky (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8350-4068)
- Teddy Lazebnik (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7851-8147)
- Daniel Oren
- Yuval Michaeli
- George Martvel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2602-2041)
- Ouriel Elazar
- Yossi Cohen
Institutions
- University of Haifa (IL)
- Jönköping University (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2026-10-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-76637-z
- Primary Topic
- Face recognition and analysis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00