The Application of Symbolic Interactionism in the Sociology of Professions: Evolution of the Approach

The purpose of this research is a historical analysis of the symbolic interactionism paradigm contribution to the development of the sociology of professions, consideration of modern trends in the study of professions in interactionism. For this, using the method of chronological typology, the author analyzes the most characteristic works for each selected period. As such periods, urban, “Hughes”, and modern ones are distinguished. The considered papers demonstrate the development of research thought from the examination of informal professions (thief, saleswoman, musician), peculiar to the early Chicago school, towards the creation of their own terminology (E. Hughes) and research interests. The findings indicate that in the interactionists’ works, qualitative methodology dominates, and the terminology is built on the instrumental principle arising in the process of research to explain the data obtained. The analysis of explatory questions considered by interactionists includes the investigation of lower status and deviant professions, “front-line” works, and how the existing boundaries are formed and given support to.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Теория и практика общественного развития
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2026.9.9
Primary Topic
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Application of Symbolic Interactionism in the Sociology of Professions: Evolution of the Approach

N. Lytkin Dmitry
Теория и практика общественного развития
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
article

The Application of Symbolic Interactionism in the Sociology of Professions: Evolution of the Approach

N. Lytkin Dmitry
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this research is a historical analysis of the symbolic interactionism paradigm contribution to the development of the sociology of professions, consideration of modern trends in the study of professions in interactionism. For this, using the method of chronological typology, the author analyzes the most characteristic works for each selected period. As such periods, urban, “Hughes”, and modern ones are distinguished. The considered papers demonstrate the development of research thought from the examination of informal professions (thief, saleswoman, musician), peculiar to the early Chicago school, towards the creation of their own terminology (E. Hughes) and research interests. The findings indicate that in the interactionists’ works, qualitative methodology dominates, and the terminology is built on the instrumental principle arising in the process of research to explain the data obtained. The analysis of explatory questions considered by interactionists includes the investigation of lower status and deviant professions, “front-line” works, and how the existing boundaries are formed and given support to.

Теория и практика общественного развития(9)
Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Institute of Sociology (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon