ESG pillars, firm value, and economic volatility in U.S. healthcare firms

Abstract This study examines how environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and economic volatility relate to firm value and operating performance in U.S. healthcare firms. Using firm and year fixed effects, we find that the annual change in the social pillar, rather than the composite score or the environmental and governance pillars, is positively associated with market value, consistent with social issues being financially material in healthcare. The estimate is imprecise when the sample is restricted to 2015 through 2024, and within the sector the association is not found among providers and services. ESG shows no contemporaneous accounting reward and a small negative association with return on assets, and economic volatility is not robustly related to firm value, although regional volatility is positively associated with return on assets. Overall, we provide associational evidence that materiality informed, pillar level analysis is more informative than aggregate ESG scores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Financial Economics
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.70069
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ESG pillars, firm value, and economic volatility in U.S. healthcare firms

Tawfiq Taleb Tawfiq, Abdul Kareem Alwadi, Jennifer Fritch
Review of Financial Economics
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

ESG pillars, firm value, and economic volatility in U.S. healthcare firms

Tawfiq Taleb Tawfiq, Abdul Kareem Alwadi, Jennifer Fritch
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines how environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and economic volatility relate to firm value and operating performance in U.S. healthcare firms. Using firm and year fixed effects, we find that the annual change in the social pillar, rather than the composite score or the environmental and governance pillars, is positively associated with market value, consistent with social issues being financially material in healthcare. The estimate is imprecise when the sample is restricted to 2015 through 2024, and within the sector the association is not found among providers and services. ESG shows no contemporaneous accounting reward and a small negative association with return on assets, and economic volatility is not robustly related to firm value, although regional volatility is positively associated with return on assets. Overall, we provide associational evidence that materiality informed, pillar level analysis is more informative than aggregate ESG scores.

Review of Financial EconomicsVol. 45(1)
Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan (JO), Arcadia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
ESG pillars, firm value, and economic volatility in U.S. healthcare firms — Tawfiq Taleb Tawfiq, Abdul Kareem Alwadi, et al. · Review of Financial Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS