Available evidence on worm lizard (Amphisbaenia) density from systematic surveys and opportunistic records

The subterranean lifestyle of amphisbaenians limits ecological sampling, leading to sparse, methodologically heterogeneous estimates of population density. We reviewed available literature reporting on amphisbaenian density. Only a limited number of studies provide density estimates based on clearly defined sampled areas, mostly from southern Africa and typically expressed at the scale of square meters. Reported values reflect differences in methodology, excavation depth, habitat suitability, and spatial scale rather than true biological variation. Additional evidence from non-systematic excavation and surface sampling suggests that amphisbaenians may reach high local abundance where suitable subterranean habitat is available, although such data cannot be reliably converted into density estimates. Estimates derived from agricultural plowing or bulldozing, as part of environmental licensing, although usually based on several specimens, often yield lower apparent densities, likely due to incomplete detection and the inclusion of unsuitable habitat. Improved reporting standards and the careful publication of opportunistic data could substantially advance knowledge of amphisbaenian natural history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Herpetologia Brasileira
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.67174/4hqktv59
Primary Topic
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Available evidence on worm lizard (Amphisbaenia) density from systematic surveys and opportunistic records

Philip Jordaan, Henrique C. Costa
Herpetologia Brasileira
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
article

Available evidence on worm lizard (Amphisbaenia) density from systematic surveys and opportunistic records

Philip Jordaan, Henrique C. Costa
article en

Abstract

The subterranean lifestyle of amphisbaenians limits ecological sampling, leading to sparse, methodologically heterogeneous estimates of population density. We reviewed available literature reporting on amphisbaenian density. Only a limited number of studies provide density estimates based on clearly defined sampled areas, mostly from southern Africa and typically expressed at the scale of square meters. Reported values reflect differences in methodology, excavation depth, habitat suitability, and spatial scale rather than true biological variation. Additional evidence from non-systematic excavation and surface sampling suggests that amphisbaenians may reach high local abundance where suitable subterranean habitat is available, although such data cannot be reliably converted into density estimates. Estimates derived from agricultural plowing or bulldozing, as part of environmental licensing, although usually based on several specimens, often yield lower apparent densities, likely due to incomplete detection and the inclusion of unsuitable habitat. Improved reporting standards and the careful publication of opportunistic data could substantially advance knowledge of amphisbaenian natural history.

Herpetologia BrasileiraVol. 15(3)
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR), African Conservation Centre (KE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon