Predictive Power for Product Sales: A Comparative Empirical Study of Consumer Reviews and Influencer Seeding Content

Consumer reviews and influencer posts provide two different views of the same product. This study asks whether either source improves product-sales prediction beyond product attributes. The sample contains 90 skincare products, 3,060 reviews, and 450 influencer posts from Tmall and Taobao. Four OLS models compare a product-control benchmark with review, influencer, and combined feature sets. Category-stratified five-fold cross-validation evaluates held-out products, while HC3 robust standard errors are used for inference. The control model performs best (adjusted R² = 0.651, pooled out-of-fold R² = 0.617, RMSE = 0.470). Adding content features slightly raises unadjusted R² but reduces adjusted and out-of-sample performance, and no focal content coefficient is statistically significant. In this small, platform-concentrated sample, product attributes contain most of the available predictive information. Visible review and influencer signals do not improve sales prediction once controls are included. Because the sales window, temporal order, promotional exposure, and brand strength are unavailable, the findings describe predictive associations rather than causal effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2026.bh38330
Primary Topic
Digital Marketing and Social Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive Power for Product Sales: A Comparative Empirical Study of Consumer Reviews and Influencer Seeding Content

Yuqing Ye
2 links
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Digital Marketing and Social Media
article

Predictive Power for Product Sales: A Comparative Empirical Study of Consumer Reviews and Influencer Seeding Content

Yuqing Ye
article en

Abstract

Consumer reviews and influencer posts provide two different views of the same product. This study asks whether either source improves product-sales prediction beyond product attributes. The sample contains 90 skincare products, 3,060 reviews, and 450 influencer posts from Tmall and Taobao. Four OLS models compare a product-control benchmark with review, influencer, and combined feature sets. Category-stratified five-fold cross-validation evaluates held-out products, while HC3 robust standard errors are used for inference. The control model performs best (adjusted R² = 0.651, pooled out-of-fold R² = 0.617, RMSE = 0.470). Adding content features slightly raises unadjusted R² but reduces adjusted and out-of-sample performance, and no focal content coefficient is statistically significant. In this small, platform-concentrated sample, product attributes contain most of the available predictive information. Visible review and influencer signals do not improve sales prediction once controls are included. Because the sales window, temporal order, promotional exposure, and brand strength are unavailable, the findings describe predictive associations rather than causal effects.

Advances in Economics Management and Political SciencesVol. 311(1)
Hunan Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Marketing and Social Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon