Key Drivers of Flood Damage Differ Between Low and High Water Depths

ABSTRACT Understanding which factors have the greatest influence on flood damage helps decision‐makers to target interventions more effectively. This study investigates whether the explanatory variables for residential flood damage differ between low‐ and high‐water depth conditions. We analyzed a transnational survey database ( n = 1245) from the 2021 floods in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands using machine learning algorithms and permutation feature importance to assess variable importance for building and content damage. The median water depth (1.15 m) was used as a threshold to define the low‐ and high‐water‐depth ranges. In the low‐water‐depth range, water depth is by far the most important factor in explaining unitary building and content damage. In the high‐water‐depth range, unitary building damage is primarily influenced by water depth, prior hazard knowledge, and human stability. For unitary content damage in the high‐water‐depth range, ownership status and footprint area are also key influencing factors alongside water depth. The results suggest that, while water depth is a good predictor of damage, additional variables become necessary to fully explain it under more extreme hazard conditions, underscoring the value of multivariable models. From a policymaker's perspective, the results emphasize the importance of raising awareness through target‐group‐specific emergency and risk communication (e.g., for tenants and homeowners).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70271
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key Drivers of Flood Damage Differ Between Low and High Water Depths

Heidi Kreibich, Ravi Kumar Guntu, Daniela Rodríguez Castro, Annegret H. Thieken et al.
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Key Drivers of Flood Damage Differ Between Low and High Water Depths

Heidi Kreibich, Ravi Kumar Guntu, Daniela Rodríguez Castro, Annegret H. Thieken, Sébastien Erpicum, Benjamin Dewals, Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, Thijs Endendijk, Maria Paula Ávila-Guzmán, L. Dillenardt
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Understanding which factors have the greatest influence on flood damage helps decision‐makers to target interventions more effectively. This study investigates whether the explanatory variables for residential flood damage differ between low‐ and high‐water depth conditions. We analyzed a transnational survey database ( n = 1245) from the 2021 floods in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands using machine learning algorithms and permutation feature importance to assess variable importance for building and content damage. The median water depth (1.15 m) was used as a threshold to define the low‐ and high‐water‐depth ranges. In the low‐water‐depth range, water depth is by far the most important factor in explaining unitary building and content damage. In the high‐water‐depth range, unitary building damage is primarily influenced by water depth, prior hazard knowledge, and human stability. For unitary content damage in the high‐water‐depth range, ownership status and footprint area are also key influencing factors alongside water depth. The results suggest that, while water depth is a good predictor of damage, additional variables become necessary to fully explain it under more extreme hazard conditions, underscoring the value of multivariable models. From a policymaker's perspective, the results emphasize the importance of raising awareness through target‐group‐specific emergency and risk communication (e.g., for tenants and homeowners).

Journal of Flood Risk ManagementVol. 19(4)
University of Liège (BE), University of Potsdam (DE), Tauw Group (Netherlands) (NL), Deltares (NL), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon