Land as Relationship, Not Property: The Politics of Land Justice among the Lugbara of Omugo Sub-County, Terego District, Uganda

Contemporary gender and development programs in Sub-Saharan Africa often rely on Eurocentric frameworks that view gender solely through the lens of patriarchal dominance, frequently overlooking the nuance of indigenous safety nets. This article challenges these binary models by examining how customary land stewardship systems inform male participation and household livelihood resilience in Uganda. Drawing on qualitative doctoral field data from Omugo Sub-County, Terego District, the study utilizes an Indigenous Narrative Research Design (INRD) consisting of Kwete sharing circles, council of elders’ dialogues, key informant interviews, and Parish Development Model (PDM) group narrative sessions. The 77 participants comprised of 39 women and 38 men. The empirical evidence reveals that customary Lugbara land distribution is inherently relational rather than exclusively male-dominated. Historically, land access and usage rights flowed through matri-central allocations and maternal lineage provisions, embedding vital social safety nets for vulnerable or returning women. This customary architecture stands in direct tension with recent national legal instruments, particularly the Succession (Amendment) Act, 2022, which enforces individualistic, gender-neutral statutory divisions. However, top-down statutory legal interventions and external rights-focused programming have inadvertently disrupted this architecture, correlating locally with rising marital separation, land litigation, and the marginalization of young men from land access. By centering the indigenous philosophy of Ama-tualu (relational interconnectedness), this article argues for a paradigm shift away from adversarial, individualized land tenure models toward relational gender reciprocity. Ultimately, the study proposes a braided model of legal recognition that codifies indigenous safety-net obligations rather than displacing them, offering a transferable framework for rethinking gendered land security across agrarian Sub-Saharan Africa. Keywords: Ama-tualu; Customary Land Tenure; Indigenous Narrative Research Design; Lugbara; Livelihood Resilience; Uganda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Policy & Governance
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2618
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Land as Relationship, Not Property: The Politics of Land Justice among the Lugbara of Omugo Sub-County, Terego District, Uganda

Steve Ouma Akoth, Christine John Oyokuru Amaa, Gladys M. M. Nyachieo
Journal of Public Policy & Governance
Land Rights and Reforms
article

Land as Relationship, Not Property: The Politics of Land Justice among the Lugbara of Omugo Sub-County, Terego District, Uganda

Steve Ouma Akoth, Christine John Oyokuru Amaa, Gladys M. M. Nyachieo
article en

Abstract

Contemporary gender and development programs in Sub-Saharan Africa often rely on Eurocentric frameworks that view gender solely through the lens of patriarchal dominance, frequently overlooking the nuance of indigenous safety nets. This article challenges these binary models by examining how customary land stewardship systems inform male participation and household livelihood resilience in Uganda. Drawing on qualitative doctoral field data from Omugo Sub-County, Terego District, the study utilizes an Indigenous Narrative Research Design (INRD) consisting of Kwete sharing circles, council of elders’ dialogues, key informant interviews, and Parish Development Model (PDM) group narrative sessions. The 77 participants comprised of 39 women and 38 men. The empirical evidence reveals that customary Lugbara land distribution is inherently relational rather than exclusively male-dominated. Historically, land access and usage rights flowed through matri-central allocations and maternal lineage provisions, embedding vital social safety nets for vulnerable or returning women. This customary architecture stands in direct tension with recent national legal instruments, particularly the Succession (Amendment) Act, 2022, which enforces individualistic, gender-neutral statutory divisions. However, top-down statutory legal interventions and external rights-focused programming have inadvertently disrupted this architecture, correlating locally with rising marital separation, land litigation, and the marginalization of young men from land access. By centering the indigenous philosophy of Ama-tualu (relational interconnectedness), this article argues for a paradigm shift away from adversarial, individualized land tenure models toward relational gender reciprocity. Ultimately, the study proposes a braided model of legal recognition that codifies indigenous safety-net obligations rather than displacing them, offering a transferable framework for rethinking gendered land security across agrarian Sub-Saharan Africa. Keywords: Ama-tualu; Customary Land Tenure; Indigenous Narrative Research Design; Lugbara; Livelihood Resilience; Uganda.

Journal of Public Policy & GovernanceVol. 10(4)
Tangaza University (KE)
Gender equality, Reduced inequalities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions, No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Land Rights and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon