Psychological Possibilities and Limitations of Using Artificial Intelligence in the Training of Psychologists

The article aims to analyze the psychological opportunities and limitations of using artificial intelligence in the training of psychologists drawing on the recent empirical studies data. It examines the evolution of AI in education. A meta-analysis by Zhang et al. (2025) demonstrates that integrated cognitive and emotional support provided by AI yields the greatest outcome for knowledge acquisition. A review by Brassler and Krys (2026) highlights the psychological functions of generative AI, while a review by Prégent et al. (2025) systematizes the barriers to AI implementation. The paper substantiates the need to foster a “critical dialogue with AI” meta-competence in future psychologists. It concludes that AI serves as an effective tool that complements rather than replaces human interaction in the training of psychologists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Общество социология психология педагогика
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2026.9.3
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Possibilities and Limitations of Using Artificial Intelligence in the Training of Psychologists

A. Plotnikova Evgeniya, N. Voronin Anatoly
4 links
Общество социология психология педагогика
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Psychological Possibilities and Limitations of Using Artificial Intelligence in the Training of Psychologists

A. Plotnikova Evgeniya, N. Voronin Anatoly
article en

Abstract

The article aims to analyze the psychological opportunities and limitations of using artificial intelligence in the training of psychologists drawing on the recent empirical studies data. It examines the evolution of AI in education. A meta-analysis by Zhang et al. (2025) demonstrates that integrated cognitive and emotional support provided by AI yields the greatest outcome for knowledge acquisition. A review by Brassler and Krys (2026) highlights the psychological functions of generative AI, while a review by Prégent et al. (2025) systematizes the barriers to AI implementation. The paper substantiates the need to foster a “critical dialogue with AI” meta-competence in future psychologists. It concludes that AI serves as an effective tool that complements rather than replaces human interaction in the training of psychologists.

Общество социология психология педагогика(9)
State Academic University of Humanities (RU)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon