County Birth-Record Completeness in Public U.S. Natality Data: A Suppression-Aware County Index, 2016–2024

Birth certificates are the foundation of U.S. natality statistics, yet the share of records with an item left unknown varies across reporting areas, and public data identify counties only when they have at least 100,000 residents. We found no reproducible public measure of item completeness at the county level. We present the County Birth-Record Completeness Index (CBRCI), built from CDC WONDER natality data for 12 birth-certificate items in the 570 counties WONDER identifies, pooled over 2016-2024 and in three 3-year windows. WONDER suppresses counts of 1-9, and suppression concentrates in the best-reporting counties, so CBRCI treats every suppressed "unknown" count as interval-censored rather than substituting a value. It combines interval bounds, truncated beta-binomial multiple imputation and an interval-censored beta-binomial likelihood, decides whether a single composite is justified with pre-specified reliability and rank-stability criteria, and enforces a fail-closed disclosure audit on every released file. Pooled unknown rates ranged from 0.06% (delivery method) to 3.2% (maternal weight gain); 12.9% of county-item cells remained suppressed after pooling; and 44-74% of county variance lay between states. A composite was not supported once state differences were removed, so the index is released as three domain scores. Within states, no association with provider supply, shortage designation, uninsurance or routine checkups survived false-discovery control across 72 tests. In simulation, the interval-censored likelihood was unbiased with 0.94-0.96 coverage, whereas dropping suppressed cells biased estimates by up to 0.19 on the log-odds scale. State estimates agreed closely with NCHS published percentages (Spearman 0.86-0.97 for 10 of 12 items).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preprints.org
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202610.2542.v1
Primary Topic
Medical Coding and Health Information
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

County Birth-Record Completeness in Public U.S. Natality Data: A Suppression-Aware County Index, 2016–2024

Selorm Buaka
Preprints.org
Medical Coding and Health Information
preprint

County Birth-Record Completeness in Public U.S. Natality Data: A Suppression-Aware County Index, 2016–2024

Selorm Buaka
preprint en

Abstract

Birth certificates are the foundation of U.S. natality statistics, yet the share of records with an item left unknown varies across reporting areas, and public data identify counties only when they have at least 100,000 residents. We found no reproducible public measure of item completeness at the county level. We present the County Birth-Record Completeness Index (CBRCI), built from CDC WONDER natality data for 12 birth-certificate items in the 570 counties WONDER identifies, pooled over 2016-2024 and in three 3-year windows. WONDER suppresses counts of 1-9, and suppression concentrates in the best-reporting counties, so CBRCI treats every suppressed "unknown" count as interval-censored rather than substituting a value. It combines interval bounds, truncated beta-binomial multiple imputation and an interval-censored beta-binomial likelihood, decides whether a single composite is justified with pre-specified reliability and rank-stability criteria, and enforces a fail-closed disclosure audit on every released file. Pooled unknown rates ranged from 0.06% (delivery method) to 3.2% (maternal weight gain); 12.9% of county-item cells remained suppressed after pooling; and 44-74% of county variance lay between states. A composite was not supported once state differences were removed, so the index is released as three domain scores. Within states, no association with provider supply, shortage designation, uninsurance or routine checkups survived false-discovery control across 72 tests. In simulation, the interval-censored likelihood was unbiased with 0.94-0.96 coverage, whereas dropping suppressed cells biased estimates by up to 0.19 on the log-odds scale. State estimates agreed closely with NCHS published percentages (Spearman 0.86-0.97 for 10 of 12 items).

Preprints.org
Medical Coding and Health Information
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon