The role of informal social support in child maltreatment prevention: scoping review

Informal social support is considered a key protective factor in child maltreatment research, yet the literature varies widely in how this construct is theorized, measured, and applied. This scoping review synthesized empirical studies to address three questions: (1) which theoretical frameworks have been used to explain the influence of informal social support on child maltreatment; (2) how informal support has been operationalized and measured; and (3) the functional role it has played in analytic models. Among studies that reported using a theoretical framework, ecological perspectives and stress-coping frameworks were most commonly used (73%). Measurement focused on instrumental (n = 31) and emotional (n = 30) support, while informational and belonging support were examined less often. Family members were the most common support source (n = 22); however, in 41% of studies, the source of support was not specified, which hampers the development of targeted interventions. Nearly half of the studies treated informal support as a moderator (48.7%), while fewer regarded it as a mediator (17.1%), indicating a predominant emphasis on buffering processes. The results show that there is a need for clearer theoretical specification, greater consistency in measurement, and a more in-depth examination of the mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Social Work
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2026.2754447
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of informal social support in child maltreatment prevention: scoping review

Wenxing Wei, Jeesoo Jeon
Journal of Family Social Work
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

The role of informal social support in child maltreatment prevention: scoping review

Wenxing Wei, Jeesoo Jeon
article en

Abstract

Informal social support is considered a key protective factor in child maltreatment research, yet the literature varies widely in how this construct is theorized, measured, and applied. This scoping review synthesized empirical studies to address three questions: (1) which theoretical frameworks have been used to explain the influence of informal social support on child maltreatment; (2) how informal support has been operationalized and measured; and (3) the functional role it has played in analytic models. Among studies that reported using a theoretical framework, ecological perspectives and stress-coping frameworks were most commonly used (73%). Measurement focused on instrumental (n = 31) and emotional (n = 30) support, while informational and belonging support were examined less often. Family members were the most common support source (n = 22); however, in 41% of studies, the source of support was not specified, which hampers the development of targeted interventions. Nearly half of the studies treated informal support as a moderator (48.7%), while fewer regarded it as a mediator (17.1%), indicating a predominant emphasis on buffering processes. The results show that there is a need for clearer theoretical specification, greater consistency in measurement, and a more in-depth examination of the mechanisms.

Journal of Family Social Work
Cleveland State University (US), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon