Temporal controls on fluid–rock interaction in the evolution of the Abovyan iron oxide–apatite deposit, Armenia

Iron oxide–apatite (IOA) deposits are globally significant sources of Fe, P, and Rare Earth Elements (REEs). Although input of hydrothermal processes into their origin is acknowledged, direct temporal constraints on the duration and style of their hydrothermal evolution remain scarce. The Abovyan deposit in central Armenia, hosted by late Miocene andesites, is one of the youngest known IOA systems worldwide and the only example in the Lesser Caucasus, providing a rare opportunity to address this problem. We integrate in-situ U–Pb dating of apatite and monazite with electron microprobe and LA-ICP-MS analyses, Raman spectroscopy and textural observations on samples from a single continuous drill core (67–337 m). A total of 162 analyses define a narrow age window between 5.58 ± 0.08 and 4.98 ± 0.07 Ma. Pristine F-rich apatite from the top and base of the section yields the oldest ages, consistent with magmatic crystallization. Monazite confined to Cl-bearing apatite domains gives an intermediate age of 5.26 ± 0.06 Ma, demonstrating new hydrothermal crystallization. Younger ages in Cl-rich, inclusion-rich apatite of the upper–middle interval extend down to 4.98 ± 0.07 Ma and provide direct evidence that hydrothermal activity continued after monazite formation. The depth-dependent spread of apatite ages is a record of staged fluid–rock interaction. Incomplete replacement of early F-rich apatite by later Cl-rich generations is reflected in younger apparent (mixed) ages, which document a minimum duration of hydrothermal activity in the upper-middle part of the deposit for at least several hundred thousand years after magmatic crystallization. Altered apatite domains are depleted in REE and enriched in Cl, consistent with coupled dissolution–reprecipitation. These features closely parallel fluid–rock interaction in IOA systems such as Kiruna and El Laco, but Abovyan uniquely provides temporal control to demonstrate that such processes persisted over protracted timescales in a roof-focused, compartmentalized regime.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mineralium Deposita
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-026-01492-x
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal controls on fluid–rock interaction in the evolution of the Abovyan iron oxide–apatite deposit, Armenia

Christian A. Bergemann, Robert P. Moritz, Axel Gerdes, Samvel Hovakimyan et al.
1 links
Mineralium Deposita
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Temporal controls on fluid–rock interaction in the evolution of the Abovyan iron oxide–apatite deposit, Armenia

Christian A. Bergemann, Robert P. Moritz, Axel Gerdes, Samvel Hovakimyan, Khachatur B. Meliksetian, Nikolai Nekrylov, Ervin Veress, Vasily D. Shcherbakov, Ivan Chayka
article en

Abstract

Iron oxide–apatite (IOA) deposits are globally significant sources of Fe, P, and Rare Earth Elements (REEs). Although input of hydrothermal processes into their origin is acknowledged, direct temporal constraints on the duration and style of their hydrothermal evolution remain scarce. The Abovyan deposit in central Armenia, hosted by late Miocene andesites, is one of the youngest known IOA systems worldwide and the only example in the Lesser Caucasus, providing a rare opportunity to address this problem. We integrate in-situ U–Pb dating of apatite and monazite with electron microprobe and LA-ICP-MS analyses, Raman spectroscopy and textural observations on samples from a single continuous drill core (67–337 m). A total of 162 analyses define a narrow age window between 5.58 ± 0.08 and 4.98 ± 0.07 Ma. Pristine F-rich apatite from the top and base of the section yields the oldest ages, consistent with magmatic crystallization. Monazite confined to Cl-bearing apatite domains gives an intermediate age of 5.26 ± 0.06 Ma, demonstrating new hydrothermal crystallization. Younger ages in Cl-rich, inclusion-rich apatite of the upper–middle interval extend down to 4.98 ± 0.07 Ma and provide direct evidence that hydrothermal activity continued after monazite formation. The depth-dependent spread of apatite ages is a record of staged fluid–rock interaction. Incomplete replacement of early F-rich apatite by later Cl-rich generations is reflected in younger apparent (mixed) ages, which document a minimum duration of hydrothermal activity in the upper-middle part of the deposit for at least several hundred thousand years after magmatic crystallization. Altered apatite domains are depleted in REE and enriched in Cl, consistent with coupled dissolution–reprecipitation. These features closely parallel fluid–rock interaction in IOA systems such as Kiruna and El Laco, but Abovyan uniquely provides temporal control to demonstrate that such processes persisted over protracted timescales in a roof-focused, compartmentalized regime.

Mineralium Deposita
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), University of Geneva (CH), Luleå University of Technology (SE), Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Heidelberg University (DE), Institute of Experimental Mineralogy (RU), Institute of Geological Sciences (AM), Bavarian Natural History Collections (DE), National Academy of Sciences of Armenia (AM)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon