Texting “I’m Sorry” at Work: How Emotion Expression Modality Shapes Apology Effectiveness

This research examines how the modality of expression in text-based workplace apologies impacts forgiveness. Drawing on the Emotions as Social Information model, we compare apologies with emotion words, emojis, both, or neither across three studies. Study 1 demonstrates that apology type affected willingness to forgive, perceived remorse, sincerity, and appropriateness. Study 2 replicated the advantage of emotion words over emojis for forgiveness, remorse, and appropriateness, and showed that relational closeness does not moderate the effect. Across Studies 1 and 2, mediation analyses indicated that sincerity and appropriateness, rather than perceived remorse, accounted for differences in forgiveness. Study 3 examined the apologizer’s perspective and found that participants preferred to use emotion word apologies and perceived them as more effective than emoji or baseline apologies, regardless of transgression severity. These findings challenge assumptions that digital nonverbal cues function equivalently to verbal expressions and highlight the importance of communication modality in virtual environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Business Communication
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884261498409
Primary Topic
Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Texting “I’m Sorry” at Work: How Emotion Expression Modality Shapes Apology Effectiveness

Ella Glikson, Monica A. Riordan
International Journal of Business Communication
Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
article

Texting “I’m Sorry” at Work: How Emotion Expression Modality Shapes Apology Effectiveness

Ella Glikson, Monica A. Riordan
article en

Abstract

This research examines how the modality of expression in text-based workplace apologies impacts forgiveness. Drawing on the Emotions as Social Information model, we compare apologies with emotion words, emojis, both, or neither across three studies. Study 1 demonstrates that apology type affected willingness to forgive, perceived remorse, sincerity, and appropriateness. Study 2 replicated the advantage of emotion words over emojis for forgiveness, remorse, and appropriateness, and showed that relational closeness does not moderate the effect. Across Studies 1 and 2, mediation analyses indicated that sincerity and appropriateness, rather than perceived remorse, accounted for differences in forgiveness. Study 3 examined the apologizer’s perspective and found that participants preferred to use emotion word apologies and perceived them as more effective than emoji or baseline apologies, regardless of transgression severity. These findings challenge assumptions that digital nonverbal cues function equivalently to verbal expressions and highlight the importance of communication modality in virtual environments.

International Journal of Business Communication
Bar-Ilan University (IL), Chatham University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Texting “I’m Sorry” at Work: How Emotion Expression Modality Shapes Apology Effectiveness — Ella Glikson, Monica A. Riordan · International Journal of Business Communication (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS