E-Cigarettes with and without Behavioral Support for Smoking Cessation

BACKGROUND: Trials that have shown that e-cigarettes are effective in helping people quit smoking typically provided behavioral support in addition to e-cigarettes. Behavioral support is not always available or wanted, but it is not known whether e-cigarettes are effective without it. METHODS: Participants who smoked and were motivated to quit were randomly assigned to National Health Service SmokeFree automated email messages (supportive messages), an e-cigarette starter pack alone (EC-only), or an e-cigarette starter pack plus multisession telephone-based behavioral support (EC+). The primary outcome was biochemically validated sustained abstinence from smoking at 6 months. Participants who were lost to follow-up or did not provide biochemical validation were assumed to continue to smoke. A significance level of 0.025 was prespecified for each of the two primary comparisons (EC-only vs. supportive messages and EC+ vs. EC-only). RESULTS: The 6-month abstinence rates were 6.4% in the supportive messages group, 11.3% in the EC-only group (EC-only vs. supportive messages relative risk 1.76; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 3.01; P=0.018), and 21.1% in the EC+ group, (EC+ vs. EC-only relative risk 1.87; 97.5% CI, 1.27 to 2.75; P<0.001). Serious adverse events were reported by 8.1%, 10.8%, and 10.7% of participants in the supportive messages, EC-only, and EC+ groups, respectively. There were four deaths, two in the EC-only group and two in the EC+ group. CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarettes without further support were more effective than supportive messaging in helping people achieve sustained validated abstinence from smoking at 6 months. E-cigarettes with multisession telephone-based support were more effective than e-cigarettes alone. (Funded by The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR129627); ISRCTN number, 61193406.).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NEJM Evidence
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1056/evidoa2600065
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

E-Cigarettes with and without Behavioral Support for Smoking Cessation

Steve Parrott, Fiona Dobbie, Linda Bauld, Daniella Ladmore et al.
1 citations
NEJM Evidence
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
4.58
article

E-Cigarettes with and without Behavioral Support for Smoking Cessation

Steve Parrott, Fiona Dobbie, Linda Bauld, Daniella Ladmore, William Martin Ricketts, Peter Hájek, Dunja Przulj, Kirsten McAlpine, Hayden J McRobbie, Katie Myers Smith, Anna Phillips‐Waller, Martine Miller, Peter Sasieni, Francesca Pesola, Jinshuo Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trials that have shown that e-cigarettes are effective in helping people quit smoking typically provided behavioral support in addition to e-cigarettes. Behavioral support is not always available or wanted, but it is not known whether e-cigarettes are effective without it. METHODS: Participants who smoked and were motivated to quit were randomly assigned to National Health Service SmokeFree automated email messages (supportive messages), an e-cigarette starter pack alone (EC-only), or an e-cigarette starter pack plus multisession telephone-based behavioral support (EC+). The primary outcome was biochemically validated sustained abstinence from smoking at 6 months. Participants who were lost to follow-up or did not provide biochemical validation were assumed to continue to smoke. A significance level of 0.025 was prespecified for each of the two primary comparisons (EC-only vs. supportive messages and EC+ vs. EC-only). RESULTS: The 6-month abstinence rates were 6.4% in the supportive messages group, 11.3% in the EC-only group (EC-only vs. supportive messages relative risk 1.76; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 3.01; P=0.018), and 21.1% in the EC+ group, (EC+ vs. EC-only relative risk 1.87; 97.5% CI, 1.27 to 2.75; P<0.001). Serious adverse events were reported by 8.1%, 10.8%, and 10.7% of participants in the supportive messages, EC-only, and EC+ groups, respectively. There were four deaths, two in the EC-only group and two in the EC+ group. CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarettes without further support were more effective than supportive messaging in helping people achieve sustained validated abstinence from smoking at 6 months. E-cigarettes with multisession telephone-based support were more effective than e-cigarettes alone. (Funded by The National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR129627); ISRCTN number, 61193406.).

NEJM EvidenceVol. 5(11)
National Health Service (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (AU), University of York (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Smoking Behavior and Cessation
4.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon