The controversial role of the European Commission in the DSA’s public enforcement

The Digital Services Act (Regulation (EU) 2022/2065), which governs the conduct of online platforms and marketplaces, is set to transform the functioning of the online environment in terms of its transparency and the risks it poses. To ensure the effectiveness of the instrument, the European legislator has entrusted its public enforcement system not only to the corresponding national authorities, but also to the European Commission. This is a novel decision in that, traditionally, the powers to enforce European rules have rested exclusively with national authorities, but not with the European institution. Against this backdrop of change, this research will seek to explore and reflect on the reasons justifying the adoption of this approach, as well as its legitimacy and the controversy it has sparked and continues to spark today. In view of the above, this research combines analytical, comparative, legal, exegetical and teleological methods, which will lead to the conclusion that, whilst the appointment of the Commission is justified in order to prevent lax oversight of compliance with the legislation, its actions still fall short of the necessary standard of rigour, as they are influenced by political factors, and this could give rise to a future need to replace this body with a supranational and independent agency

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Tarapacá Law Journal
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64966/tlj-2026-v1-e11-en
Primary Topic
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The controversial role of the European Commission in the DSA’s public enforcement

Rosa Pla Almendros
1 links
Tarapacá Law Journal
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
article

The controversial role of the European Commission in the DSA’s public enforcement

Rosa Pla Almendros
article en

Abstract

The Digital Services Act (Regulation (EU) 2022/2065), which governs the conduct of online platforms and marketplaces, is set to transform the functioning of the online environment in terms of its transparency and the risks it poses. To ensure the effectiveness of the instrument, the European legislator has entrusted its public enforcement system not only to the corresponding national authorities, but also to the European Commission. This is a novel decision in that, traditionally, the powers to enforce European rules have rested exclusively with national authorities, but not with the European institution. Against this backdrop of change, this research will seek to explore and reflect on the reasons justifying the adoption of this approach, as well as its legitimacy and the controversy it has sparked and continues to spark today. In view of the above, this research combines analytical, comparative, legal, exegetical and teleological methods, which will lead to the conclusion that, whilst the appointment of the Commission is justified in order to prevent lax oversight of compliance with the legislation, its actions still fall short of the necessary standard of rigour, as they are influenced by political factors, and this could give rise to a future need to replace this body with a supranational and independent agency

Tarapacá Law JournalVol. 1(1)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon