Theorizing the Democratic Crisis: A Symposium on Jeffrey Alexander’s Frontlash/Backlash

This symposium engages with Jeffrey Alexander’s recent book Frontlash/Backlash (published in 2025) a significant contribution to civil sphere theory that places contestation over belonging at the centre of democratic life. The symposium opens with an introduction by Eric Taylor Woods, followed by critical commentaries from Matthias Revers, Lone Sorensen, and Maria Rovisco. Together, these contributions examine conceptual, empirical, and normative implications of Alexander’s argument. They raise questions about the place of regulative and communicative institutions in civil spheres, the impact of digital media in amplifying polarization, and the normative foundations of the distinction between ‘frontlash’ and ‘backlash’ movements. In response, Alexander offers a robust defence of his framework, clarifying its underlying assumptions and contesting key critiques. Ultimately, the symposium offers a sustained dialogue on the extent to which democratic societies can endure deepening polarization and escalating contestation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cultural Sociology
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755261484198
Primary Topic
Political Theory and Democracy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theorizing the Democratic Crisis: A Symposium on Jeffrey Alexander’s Frontlash/Backlash

Eric Taylor Woods, Lone Sorensen, Jeffrey C. Alexander, Maria Luís Rovisco et al.
1 links
Cultural Sociology
Political Theory and Democracy
article

Theorizing the Democratic Crisis: A Symposium on Jeffrey Alexander’s Frontlash/Backlash

Eric Taylor Woods, Lone Sorensen, Jeffrey C. Alexander, Maria Luís Rovisco, Matthias Revers
article en

Abstract

This symposium engages with Jeffrey Alexander’s recent book Frontlash/Backlash (published in 2025) a significant contribution to civil sphere theory that places contestation over belonging at the centre of democratic life. The symposium opens with an introduction by Eric Taylor Woods, followed by critical commentaries from Matthias Revers, Lone Sorensen, and Maria Rovisco. Together, these contributions examine conceptual, empirical, and normative implications of Alexander’s argument. They raise questions about the place of regulative and communicative institutions in civil spheres, the impact of digital media in amplifying polarization, and the normative foundations of the distinction between ‘frontlash’ and ‘backlash’ movements. In response, Alexander offers a robust defence of his framework, clarifying its underlying assumptions and contesting key critiques. Ultimately, the symposium offers a sustained dialogue on the extent to which democratic societies can endure deepening polarization and escalating contestation.

Cultural Sociology
University of Leeds (GB), Yale University (US)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Political Theory and Democracy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon