Germline pathogenic variants identification through comprehensive cancer genome profiling

Comprehensive cancer genome profiling (CGP) is recommended for the identification of actionable somatic mutations in a selected subgroup of cancer patients. Some variants detected by CGP can be constitutional. The aim of this study is to evaluate the rate of potential and confirmed constitutional pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (overall defined as PVs) identified through CGP according to the recommendations of the European Society of Medical Oncology. This is a prospective interventional trial that enrolled patients with solid cancers in whom molecular assessment was clinically indicated based on national guidelines, referring them for CGP (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06020625). Patients with suspected constitutional variants were subsequently referred for germline testing. The present analysis focuses on the first two years of the program, from January 2022 to December 2023. Of 2688 samples (2674 patients) with a CGP report, more than half were represented by gynecologic cancers (endometrial and ovarian). 16% of the patients were addressed to genetic evaluation for 527 suspected constitutional PVs, with a compliance to genetic counselling of 80%. 331 patients underwent germline testing, of whom 73% harbored at least one PV, with 66% of tested variants confirmed to be germline. Interestingly, 16% of germline variants were secondary findings and 20% of the confirmed “on-tumor” germline PVs were in moderate-risk genes. Twenty additional constitutional PVs were identified in 19 patients based on the results of other somatic tests or through additional tests requested following genetic counselling (0.7% of the entire cohort). Constitutional PVs were detected in about 10% of an unselected solid tumor cohort through CGP. A relevant fraction of the constitutional PVs were secondary findings or constitutional variants in moderate penetrance genes, that would not have been detected based on current guidelines. The integration of CGP with systematic genetic counseling provides a comprehensive approach that optimizes both therapeutic decision-making and identification of hereditary cancer syndromes. Protocol ID: FPG500, ID number: 3837. The study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06020625.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genome Medicine
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-026-01762-3
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Germline pathogenic variants identification through comprehensive cancer genome profiling

Iolanda Mozzetta, Antonio Vitale, Simona Duranti, Maria Alessandra Calegari et al.
3 links
Genome Medicine
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Germline pathogenic variants identification through comprehensive cancer genome profiling

Iolanda Mozzetta, Antonio Vitale, Simona Duranti, Maria Alessandra Calegari, Maurizio Genuardi, Alessia Piermattei, Francesco Fanfani, Luciano Giacò, Giovanni Scambia, Lisa Salvatore, Valentina Iacobelli, Giampaolo Tortora, Arianna Panfili, Tina Pasciuto, Rita Trozzi, Camilla Nero, Angelo Minucci, Anna Fagotti, Giulia Maneri, Diana Giannarelli, Annamaria Pietrosante, Ketty Peris, Ilenia Marino, Emilio Bria, Roberto Iacovelli, Emanuela Lucci Cordisco, Simone Rossi
article en

Abstract

Comprehensive cancer genome profiling (CGP) is recommended for the identification of actionable somatic mutations in a selected subgroup of cancer patients. Some variants detected by CGP can be constitutional. The aim of this study is to evaluate the rate of potential and confirmed constitutional pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (overall defined as PVs) identified through CGP according to the recommendations of the European Society of Medical Oncology. This is a prospective interventional trial that enrolled patients with solid cancers in whom molecular assessment was clinically indicated based on national guidelines, referring them for CGP (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06020625). Patients with suspected constitutional variants were subsequently referred for germline testing. The present analysis focuses on the first two years of the program, from January 2022 to December 2023. Of 2688 samples (2674 patients) with a CGP report, more than half were represented by gynecologic cancers (endometrial and ovarian). 16% of the patients were addressed to genetic evaluation for 527 suspected constitutional PVs, with a compliance to genetic counselling of 80%. 331 patients underwent germline testing, of whom 73% harbored at least one PV, with 66% of tested variants confirmed to be germline. Interestingly, 16% of germline variants were secondary findings and 20% of the confirmed “on-tumor” germline PVs were in moderate-risk genes. Twenty additional constitutional PVs were identified in 19 patients based on the results of other somatic tests or through additional tests requested following genetic counselling (0.7% of the entire cohort). Constitutional PVs were detected in about 10% of an unselected solid tumor cohort through CGP. A relevant fraction of the constitutional PVs were secondary findings or constitutional variants in moderate penetrance genes, that would not have been detected based on current guidelines. The integration of CGP with systematic genetic counseling provides a comprehensive approach that optimizes both therapeutic decision-making and identification of hereditary cancer syndromes. Protocol ID: FPG500, ID number: 3837. The study was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06020625.

Genome Medicine
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University of Milan (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), European School of Molecular Medicine (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon