Science Communication against Misinformation

How can science communication sustain informed public dialogue during an era when academia and institutions in general are under mounting pressure from multiple societal forces? In this paper, we reflect on where science communication fails, and how to improve structures and incentives to strengthen public understanding, trust, and democratic dialogue. We identify four non-exhaustive aspects that we consider particularly insightful for developing recommendations targeted at three distinct stakeholder groups: media and educators, academia, and policymakers. Our perspectives and recommendations aim to improve science communication to foster citizens’ resilience against circulating misinformation, encourage science communicators to reflect on their responsibility, and help shape policies that address the root causes of misinformation. In cooperation with German Center for Research and Innovation New York

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universitätsbibliothek der LMU
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5282/ubm/epub.137954
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Science Communication against Misinformation

Marlene Sophie Altenmüller, Hilke Schellmann, Bernhard Goodwin, Vivian Trakinski et al.
2 links
Universitätsbibliothek der LMU
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Science Communication against Misinformation

Marlene Sophie Altenmüller, Hilke Schellmann, Bernhard Goodwin, Vivian Trakinski, Tobias Kretschmer, Marvin Fendt, Soren Wheeler, Jan Lüdert, Katja Simons, Weiji Ma, Juliane Gierach, Sonia Epstein, Bruce Lewenstein, Helen Fischer, Nick Reinert, Michael Jon Gorman, Ellen Horne
article en

Abstract

How can science communication sustain informed public dialogue during an era when academia and institutions in general are under mounting pressure from multiple societal forces? In this paper, we reflect on where science communication fails, and how to improve structures and incentives to strengthen public understanding, trust, and democratic dialogue. We identify four non-exhaustive aspects that we consider particularly insightful for developing recommendations targeted at three distinct stakeholder groups: media and educators, academia, and policymakers. Our perspectives and recommendations aim to improve science communication to foster citizens’ resilience against circulating misinformation, encourage science communicators to reflect on their responsibility, and help shape policies that address the root causes of misinformation. In cooperation with German Center for Research and Innovation New York

Universitätsbibliothek der LMU
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Science Communication against Misinformation — Marlene Sophie Altenmüller, Hilke Schellmann, et al. · Universitätsbibliothek der LMU (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS