Science Communication against Misinformation
How can science communication sustain informed public dialogue during an era when academia and institutions in general are under mounting pressure from multiple societal forces? In this paper, we reflect on where science communication fails, and how to improve structures and incentives to strengthen public understanding, trust, and democratic dialogue. We identify four non-exhaustive aspects that we consider particularly insightful for developing recommendations targeted at three distinct stakeholder groups: media and educators, academia, and policymakers. Our perspectives and recommendations aim to improve science communication to foster citizens’ resilience against circulating misinformation, encourage science communicators to reflect on their responsibility, and help shape policies that address the root causes of misinformation. In cooperation with German Center for Research and Innovation New York
Authors
- Marlene Sophie Altenmüller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1714-3601)
- Hilke Schellmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0233-6970)
- Bernhard Goodwin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7003-3380)
- Vivian Trakinski
- Tobias Kretschmer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7830-7825)
- Marvin Fendt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3144-2851)
- Soren Wheeler
- Jan Lüdert
- Katja Simons
- Weiji Ma
- Juliane Gierach
- Sonia Epstein
- Bruce Lewenstein
- Helen Fischer
- Nick Reinert
- Michael Jon Gorman
- Ellen Horne
Publication Details
- Journal
- Universitätsbibliothek der LMU
- Published
- 2026-10-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5282/ubm/epub.137954
- Primary Topic
- Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00