The “Beijing Effect” in AI Regulation

In this paper, the author analyzes the concept of the “Beijing effect” as an alternative to the concept of “digital authoritarianism”. The relevance of the topic stems from the rapid growth of the artificial intelligence (AI) sector and the emergence of various models of its regulation. The paper also analyzes the concept of the Digital Silk Road as a tool through which investments in the economies of other countries are transformed into China’s political influence. The author concludes that there is a transition from hard “lock-in” to soft influence, facilitated by standards and open AI models. The paper shows how China, by financing the digital infrastructure of developing countries, renders their digital sovereignty illusory. The work is valuable for understanding why AI regulation cannot be reduced to laws when the underlying infrastructure is owned by other countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Теория и практика общественного развития
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2026.9.26
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “Beijing Effect” in AI Regulation

E. Yakovlev Danila
2 links
Теория и практика общественного развития
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
article

The “Beijing Effect” in AI Regulation

E. Yakovlev Danila
article en

Abstract

In this paper, the author analyzes the concept of the “Beijing effect” as an alternative to the concept of “digital authoritarianism”. The relevance of the topic stems from the rapid growth of the artificial intelligence (AI) sector and the emergence of various models of its regulation. The paper also analyzes the concept of the Digital Silk Road as a tool through which investments in the economies of other countries are transformed into China’s political influence. The author concludes that there is a transition from hard “lock-in” to soft influence, facilitated by standards and open AI models. The paper shows how China, by financing the digital infrastructure of developing countries, renders their digital sovereignty illusory. The work is valuable for understanding why AI regulation cannot be reduced to laws when the underlying infrastructure is owned by other countries.

Теория и практика общественного развития(9)
National Research Mordovia State University (RU)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon