Small caps, large climate data gaps: disclosure shortfalls and investment implications amid regulation retreats

Purpose This study aims to establish small-cap investment relevance, examine portfolio risk exposures of small-cap stocks screened by environmental data availability, and explore disclosure coverage under three Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) threshold specifications. Design/methodology/approach This study analyses MSCI index returns during 2001–2025 and 2023 Scope 1–3 emissions data availability for 7,895 constituents. We constructs value-weighted portfolios of disclosed and non-disclosed small-cap firms, estimates risk exposure differences using Fama–French six-factor models, and compares climate–data coverage across three CSRD threshold specifications. Findings Small-cap indices recorded higher returns and risk-adjusted performance than mid + large-cap peers, though firm size is not a causal driver. Emissions coverage is lower among small caps, especially for Scope 3 and in Emerging Markets. Non-disclosed-minus-disclosed small-cap portfolios have positive monthly alphas of 1.0–1.5 percentage points and exhibit systematic differences in growth, momentum and, in Developed Markets, profitability exposures. These estimates reflect portfolio-selection effects rather than a causal disclosure effect and may capture omitted firm characteristics or model specification. Applying the original CSRD (the relaxed Omnibus) thresholds leaves 0%–4% (48.5%) of small-cap (Emerging Markets small-cap Scope 3) market value outside the reporting perimeter. Practical implications Climate-conscious investors using climate-data disclosure-based screens may take unintended factor positions when seeking market exposure or benchmark tracking. Lower reporting thresholds expand small-cap coverage, while wider exemptions preserve climate–data gaps. This study’s findings relate to climate accountability (SDG 13) and international disclosure coordination (SDG 17), but not to effects on financing, employment or inequality. Originality/value The study integrates small-cap performance, climate–data availability, portfolio screening and regulatory coverage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-05-2025-0648
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Small caps, large climate data gaps: disclosure shortfalls and investment implications amid regulation retreats

Huong Dieu Dang, Jan Heldmann
3 links
Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Small caps, large climate data gaps: disclosure shortfalls and investment implications amid regulation retreats

Huong Dieu Dang, Jan Heldmann
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to establish small-cap investment relevance, examine portfolio risk exposures of small-cap stocks screened by environmental data availability, and explore disclosure coverage under three Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) threshold specifications. Design/methodology/approach This study analyses MSCI index returns during 2001–2025 and 2023 Scope 1–3 emissions data availability for 7,895 constituents. We constructs value-weighted portfolios of disclosed and non-disclosed small-cap firms, estimates risk exposure differences using Fama–French six-factor models, and compares climate–data coverage across three CSRD threshold specifications. Findings Small-cap indices recorded higher returns and risk-adjusted performance than mid + large-cap peers, though firm size is not a causal driver. Emissions coverage is lower among small caps, especially for Scope 3 and in Emerging Markets. Non-disclosed-minus-disclosed small-cap portfolios have positive monthly alphas of 1.0–1.5 percentage points and exhibit systematic differences in growth, momentum and, in Developed Markets, profitability exposures. These estimates reflect portfolio-selection effects rather than a causal disclosure effect and may capture omitted firm characteristics or model specification. Applying the original CSRD (the relaxed Omnibus) thresholds leaves 0%–4% (48.5%) of small-cap (Emerging Markets small-cap Scope 3) market value outside the reporting perimeter. Practical implications Climate-conscious investors using climate-data disclosure-based screens may take unintended factor positions when seeking market exposure or benchmark tracking. Lower reporting thresholds expand small-cap coverage, while wider exemptions preserve climate–data gaps. This study’s findings relate to climate accountability (SDG 13) and international disclosure coordination (SDG 17), but not to effects on financing, employment or inequality. Originality/value The study integrates small-cap performance, climate–data availability, portfolio screening and regulatory coverage.

Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal
University of Canterbury (NZ), University of Bayreuth (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon