Neighborhood-Scale Disaster Risk Diagnosis and Improvement Measures Using Multi-Scale Spatial Analysis and Participatory Risk Assessment

This study identified neighborhood-scale disaster risks and proposed improvement measures by integrating multi-scale spatial analysis with participatory risk assessment. Statistical and GIS analyses were used to narrow the study area from Seoul’s autonomous districts to administrative-dong and census-block levels. Resident and stakeholder surveys, interviews, focus group interviews, and field surveys were then conducted to identify specific risks related to pedestrian safety, vulnerable groups, semi-basement flooding, and infrastructure safety. Based on a policy review and expert consultation, 13 new or expanded safety measures were proposed. The study identified risks that may be overlooked when using administrative-area averages and translated local stakeholders’ experiences into feasible policy measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2026.26.5.43
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neighborhood-Scale Disaster Risk Diagnosis and Improvement Measures Using Multi-Scale Spatial Analysis and Participatory Risk Assessment

Sukmin Lee, Youngsuk Lee, Hyungmi Yoon, Youngkarb Song
1 links
Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Neighborhood-Scale Disaster Risk Diagnosis and Improvement Measures Using Multi-Scale Spatial Analysis and Participatory Risk Assessment

Sukmin Lee, Youngsuk Lee, Hyungmi Yoon, Youngkarb Song
article en

Abstract

This study identified neighborhood-scale disaster risks and proposed improvement measures by integrating multi-scale spatial analysis with participatory risk assessment. Statistical and GIS analyses were used to narrow the study area from Seoul’s autonomous districts to administrative-dong and census-block levels. Resident and stakeholder surveys, interviews, focus group interviews, and field surveys were then conducted to identify specific risks related to pedestrian safety, vulnerable groups, semi-basement flooding, and infrastructure safety. Based on a policy review and expert consultation, 13 new or expanded safety measures were proposed. The study identified risks that may be overlooked when using administrative-area averages and translated local stakeholders’ experiences into feasible policy measures.

Korean Society of Hazard MitigationVol. 26(5)
The Seoul Institute (KR), National Disaster Management Research Institute (KR)
Sustainable cities and communities, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Neighborhood-Scale Disaster Risk Diagnosis and Improvement Measures Using Multi-Scale Spatial Analysis and Participatory Risk Assessment — Sukmin Lee, Youngsuk Lee, et al. · Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS