What are the health impacts of Diethylstilbestrol (DES): protocol for a mixed methods systematic review

This document details the protocol for the above titled mixed methods systematic review conducted by the Exeter Policy Research Programme (PRP) Evidence Review Facility (University of Exeter, UK). The aim of this work is to assess the physical and psychosocial health impacts of Diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure during pregnancy in women and in their children and subsequent generations of descendants. Review question: What are the physical and psychosocial health impacts of DES exposure during pregnancy in women and in their children and subsequent generations of descendants? Research objectives: To synthesize quantitative studies examining the health impacts of DES exposure during pregnancy in women and in their male and female descendants. To synthesise qualitative studies exploring how women exposed to DES during pregnancy and their male and female descendants view and experience its health impacts. To assess how findings from both syntheses can convergently support understanding of the health impacts of DES exposure in women during pregnancy and in their male and female descendants. Patient and public involvement and engagement: We are thankful to the people with lived experience who contributed their time and knowledge to help inform this protocol. In total, sixty-three people have directly contributed to the protocol development and the review more broadly. Please see Appendix 3 of the uploaded document for detail regarding how the written feedback we received, and our conversations with people with lived experience, informed the protocol. About us: The Exeter PRP Evidence Review facility is independently funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) [NIHR200695] to conduct systematic reviews to inform health and social care policy. Disclaimer: Views expressed in this document are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, Department of Health and Social Care of the Evidence PRP Evidence Review Facility. For further information about this review please contact: [email protected]

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23695984
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What are the health impacts of Diethylstilbestrol (DES): protocol for a mixed methods systematic review

Exeter Policy Research Programme Evidence Review Facility
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
article

What are the health impacts of Diethylstilbestrol (DES): protocol for a mixed methods systematic review

Exeter Policy Research Programme Evidence Review Facility
article en

Abstract

This document details the protocol for the above titled mixed methods systematic review conducted by the Exeter Policy Research Programme (PRP) Evidence Review Facility (University of Exeter, UK). The aim of this work is to assess the physical and psychosocial health impacts of Diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure during pregnancy in women and in their children and subsequent generations of descendants. Review question: What are the physical and psychosocial health impacts of DES exposure during pregnancy in women and in their children and subsequent generations of descendants? Research objectives: To synthesize quantitative studies examining the health impacts of DES exposure during pregnancy in women and in their male and female descendants. To synthesise qualitative studies exploring how women exposed to DES during pregnancy and their male and female descendants view and experience its health impacts. To assess how findings from both syntheses can convergently support understanding of the health impacts of DES exposure in women during pregnancy and in their male and female descendants. Patient and public involvement and engagement: We are thankful to the people with lived experience who contributed their time and knowledge to help inform this protocol. In total, sixty-three people have directly contributed to the protocol development and the review more broadly. Please see Appendix 3 of the uploaded document for detail regarding how the written feedback we received, and our conversations with people with lived experience, informed the protocol. About us: The Exeter PRP Evidence Review facility is independently funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) [NIHR200695] to conduct systematic reviews to inform health and social care policy. Disclaimer: Views expressed in this document are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, Department of Health and Social Care of the Evidence PRP Evidence Review Facility. For further information about this review please contact: [email protected]

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Exeter (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon