Patient‐Reported Missed Nursing Care and Trust in Nurses: A Cross‐Sectional Study of Patient, Nurse, and Ward Level Factors

AIM: To examine the relationship between patient-reported missed nursing care and trust in nurses and to identify patient-, nurse-, and ward-level factors associated with trust in nurses. DESIGN: A descriptive cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study was conducted with 356 hospitalised patients from medical and surgical inpatient wards. Data were collected using the Patient Information Form, Nurse and Ward Information Form, MISSCARE Survey-Patient and Trust in Nurses Scale. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed using SPSS 27. Reporting was guided by the STROBE checklist. RESULTS: The communication dimension of missed nursing care was significantly associated with trust in nurses. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that communication-related missed care remained independently associated with trust after controlling for patient-, nurse-, and ward-level factors. In contrast, nurse- and ward-level characteristics, including patient-to-nurse ratio, bed turnover rate, nurse age, professional experience, and overtime, were not significantly associated with trust. Among patient characteristics, only employment status was identified as a significant predictor of trust. No significant differences in trust or missed nursing care scores were observed across wards. CONCLUSION: Communication-related missed nursing care was independently associated with trust in nurses. The findings suggest that patients may place greater importance on communication experiences than on structural characteristics when evaluating nursing care and developing trust in nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Interventions aimed at strengthening nurse-patient communication, patient information sharing, and therapeutic interactions may contribute to improving patients' trust in nurses. Communication-related missed care should be considered an important quality indicator in inpatient settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients contributed to this study by completing the survey instruments. IMPACT: Evidence regarding the relationship between patient-reported missed nursing care and trust in nurses remains limited. Communication-related missed nursing care was independently associated with lower trust in nurses, whereas nurse- and ward-level characteristics were not significantly associated with trust. The findings may support nurses, nurse managers, and healthcare organisations in prioritising communication-focused quality improvement initiatives to strengthen patient trust in inpatient care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70593
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient‐Reported Missed Nursing Care and Trust in Nurses: A Cross‐Sectional Study of Patient, Nurse, and Ward Level Factors

Müzelfe Bıyık, Tuğba ÖZTÜRK
4 links
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
article

Patient‐Reported Missed Nursing Care and Trust in Nurses: A Cross‐Sectional Study of Patient, Nurse, and Ward Level Factors

Müzelfe Bıyık, Tuğba ÖZTÜRK
article en

Abstract

AIM: To examine the relationship between patient-reported missed nursing care and trust in nurses and to identify patient-, nurse-, and ward-level factors associated with trust in nurses. DESIGN: A descriptive cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study was conducted with 356 hospitalised patients from medical and surgical inpatient wards. Data were collected using the Patient Information Form, Nurse and Ward Information Form, MISSCARE Survey-Patient and Trust in Nurses Scale. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed using SPSS 27. Reporting was guided by the STROBE checklist. RESULTS: The communication dimension of missed nursing care was significantly associated with trust in nurses. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that communication-related missed care remained independently associated with trust after controlling for patient-, nurse-, and ward-level factors. In contrast, nurse- and ward-level characteristics, including patient-to-nurse ratio, bed turnover rate, nurse age, professional experience, and overtime, were not significantly associated with trust. Among patient characteristics, only employment status was identified as a significant predictor of trust. No significant differences in trust or missed nursing care scores were observed across wards. CONCLUSION: Communication-related missed nursing care was independently associated with trust in nurses. The findings suggest that patients may place greater importance on communication experiences than on structural characteristics when evaluating nursing care and developing trust in nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Interventions aimed at strengthening nurse-patient communication, patient information sharing, and therapeutic interactions may contribute to improving patients' trust in nurses. Communication-related missed care should be considered an important quality indicator in inpatient settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients contributed to this study by completing the survey instruments. IMPACT: Evidence regarding the relationship between patient-reported missed nursing care and trust in nurses remains limited. Communication-related missed nursing care was independently associated with lower trust in nurses, whereas nurse- and ward-level characteristics were not significantly associated with trust. The findings may support nurses, nurse managers, and healthcare organisations in prioritising communication-focused quality improvement initiatives to strengthen patient trust in inpatient care settings.

Journal of Clinical Nursing
Kutahya Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon