Dosimetric feasibility of lattice radiotherapy for bulky tumors: a paired VMAT vs. helical tomotherapy comparison - the STRYKE trial

Background Lattice Radiotherapy (LRT) delivers ablative doses to intratumoral vertices alternating with low-dose valleys to treat bulky tumors. While VMAT-LRT is widely adopted, Helical Tomotherapy (HT-LRT) may offer enhanced spatial dose modulation. This study provides the first paired dosimetric comparison of HT-LRT versus VMAT-LRT across scalar, directional, and DVH-based endpoints. Methods Paired HT-LRT and VMAT-LRT plans were evaluated in a cohort of 22 patients with bulky tumors using a staggered triangular lattice geometry (5.0 cm inter-vertex spacing, 1.0 cm diameter). Spatial dose modulation was characterized using three scalar Valley-to-Peak Dose Ratio (VPDR) computational methods (VPDR Wu , VPDR D90/D10 , VPDR median ) and a directionally resolved decomposition along principal and diagonal spatial axes. Target coverage, OAR sparing, and morphological correlations were systematically analyzed. Results HT-LRT demonstrated statistically significant superiority over VMAT-LRT across all scalar VPDR metrics ( p < 0.05). Directional analysis revealed that HT-LRT advantage is anisotropic, concentrating along intra-plane radial and principal axes, whereas oblique inter-plane diagonals showed comparable modulation between techniques. HT-LRT yielded significantly cooler valley doses and improved low-dose OAR sparing without compromising target coverage ( D 95% ). Target elongation positively correlated with radial VPDR in both modalities due to inter-plane dose summation, while compactness influenced radial VPDR exclusively in HT-LRT. Conclusion HT-LRT should provide superior, directionally selective spatial dose modulation compared with VMAT-LRT in bulky tumors. Directionally resolved VPDR analysis exposes technique-specific geometric strengths obscured by scalar summary metrics, supporting HT-LRT as a promising platform for LRT execution, while the relative contribution of delivery technique and planning strategy warrants further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1986573
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dosimetric feasibility of lattice radiotherapy for bulky tumors: a paired VMAT vs. helical tomotherapy comparison - the STRYKE trial

Di Franco, Di Franco R, Mercogliano S, d’Alesio V et al.
4 links
Frontiers in Oncology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Dosimetric feasibility of lattice radiotherapy for bulky tumors: a paired VMAT vs. helical tomotherapy comparison - the STRYKE trial

Di Franco, Di Franco R, Mercogliano S, d’Alesio V, Silvestro G, Donati C, Ravo V, Arrichiello C, De Palma G, Borzillo V, Serra M, Maranzano E, Cavalcanti E, Cellini F, Pezzulla D, Mottareale R, Cilla S, Buonanno F, Cuomo A, Scipilliti E, Ametrano G
article en

Abstract

Background Lattice Radiotherapy (LRT) delivers ablative doses to intratumoral vertices alternating with low-dose valleys to treat bulky tumors. While VMAT-LRT is widely adopted, Helical Tomotherapy (HT-LRT) may offer enhanced spatial dose modulation. This study provides the first paired dosimetric comparison of HT-LRT versus VMAT-LRT across scalar, directional, and DVH-based endpoints. Methods Paired HT-LRT and VMAT-LRT plans were evaluated in a cohort of 22 patients with bulky tumors using a staggered triangular lattice geometry (5.0 cm inter-vertex spacing, 1.0 cm diameter). Spatial dose modulation was characterized using three scalar Valley-to-Peak Dose Ratio (VPDR) computational methods (VPDR Wu , VPDR D90/D10 , VPDR median ) and a directionally resolved decomposition along principal and diagonal spatial axes. Target coverage, OAR sparing, and morphological correlations were systematically analyzed. Results HT-LRT demonstrated statistically significant superiority over VMAT-LRT across all scalar VPDR metrics ( p < 0.05). Directional analysis revealed that HT-LRT advantage is anisotropic, concentrating along intra-plane radial and principal axes, whereas oblique inter-plane diagonals showed comparable modulation between techniques. HT-LRT yielded significantly cooler valley doses and improved low-dose OAR sparing without compromising target coverage ( D 95% ). Target elongation positively correlated with radial VPDR in both modalities due to inter-plane dose summation, while compactness influenced radial VPDR exclusively in HT-LRT. Conclusion HT-LRT should provide superior, directionally selective spatial dose modulation compared with VMAT-LRT in bulky tumors. Directionally resolved VPDR analysis exposes technique-specific geometric strengths obscured by scalar summary metrics, supporting HT-LRT as a promising platform for LRT execution, while the relative contribution of delivery technique and planning strategy warrants further investigation.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (US), University of Perugia (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT), Advanced Radiation Therapy (United States) (US), Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon