Developing and evaluating a customized evidence-based safety training program for healthcare staff: a quality improvement approach

The high risk of workplace violence (WPV) for workers in mental health care settings and the potentially serious impacts, both mental and physical, have prompted many hospitals to mandate behavioral safety skills training for their staff. There are, however, some considerable challenges to delivering this type of training. First, while there are international and national/regional guidelines for mitigating WPV, the evaluation literature does not provide consistent guidance on which training methods are the most effective across a range of settings. Second, hospitals differ in terms of their objectives and their identified safety issues suggesting that a tailored approach rather than a one-size-fits-all training would be more appropriate. Finally, while there are commonly used evaluation frameworks relevant to health care, these will need to be adapted on a case-by-case basis to a tailored training approach. This article will describe models and frameworks addressing the processes involved in developing, implementing, and evaluating customized behavioral safety skills training. Preliminary findings from an actual quality improvement initiative delivered to a long-term care facility in Ontario, Canada will be presented and used as a basis to discuss where theory and actual experience converge and diverge. Successful results include the development of a replicable and theory-grounded customization process along with demonstrated short-term staff-level improvements; however, challenges remain in terms of evaluating organizational-level impact, sustainability, and resident/patient-level outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1901445
Primary Topic
Workplace Violence and Bullying
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing and evaluating a customized evidence-based safety training program for healthcare staff: a quality improvement approach

Emmanuel Bratsalis, Elizabeth Lin, Sanjeev Sockalingam, Faisal Islam et al.
1 links
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Workplace Violence and Bullying
article

Developing and evaluating a customized evidence-based safety training program for healthcare staff: a quality improvement approach

Emmanuel Bratsalis, Elizabeth Lin, Sanjeev Sockalingam, Faisal Islam, Ninon Crestois, Hugh Boyd, Muhammad Idrees Khan, Katie Hodgson
article en

Abstract

The high risk of workplace violence (WPV) for workers in mental health care settings and the potentially serious impacts, both mental and physical, have prompted many hospitals to mandate behavioral safety skills training for their staff. There are, however, some considerable challenges to delivering this type of training. First, while there are international and national/regional guidelines for mitigating WPV, the evaluation literature does not provide consistent guidance on which training methods are the most effective across a range of settings. Second, hospitals differ in terms of their objectives and their identified safety issues suggesting that a tailored approach rather than a one-size-fits-all training would be more appropriate. Finally, while there are commonly used evaluation frameworks relevant to health care, these will need to be adapted on a case-by-case basis to a tailored training approach. This article will describe models and frameworks addressing the processes involved in developing, implementing, and evaluating customized behavioral safety skills training. Preliminary findings from an actual quality improvement initiative delivered to a long-term care facility in Ontario, Canada will be presented and used as a basis to discuss where theory and actual experience converge and diverge. Successful results include the development of a replicable and theory-grounded customization process along with demonstrated short-term staff-level improvements; however, challenges remain in terms of evaluating organizational-level impact, sustainability, and resident/patient-level outcomes.

Frontiers in PsychiatryVol. 17
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA), The Wilson Centre (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Workplace Violence and Bullying
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon