Withholding One's Political Views: When, Why, and On What?

Abstract Scholarly interest in the unwillingness of people to express their political views has ballooned of late, across the world. Still, many details of when, why, and on what people self-censor remain unknown. In this largely exploratory analysis, using 2025 survey data from the United States, I pursue four objectives. First, I document the extremely high levels of self-censorship in the contemporary United States. Then I analyze the varied contexts in which people withhold their views, followed by an analysis of why they say they are reluctant to express themselves. In the most important part of my article, I examine the issues on which people are most likely to withhold their views. Distinguishing between expressed public opinion and true public opinion, I then show that on many issues self-censorship results in no ideological bias in expressed views, but on some issues—the Israeli war with Hamas, as the best example—considerable bias exists (true opinion differs from expressed opinion). I conclude with concerns about the deleterious effects of self-censorship on political discussions and deliberations in America.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Science Quarterly
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqag124
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Withholding One's Political Views: When, Why, and On What?

James L. Gibson
Political Science Quarterly
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Withholding One's Political Views: When, Why, and On What?

James L. Gibson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Scholarly interest in the unwillingness of people to express their political views has ballooned of late, across the world. Still, many details of when, why, and on what people self-censor remain unknown. In this largely exploratory analysis, using 2025 survey data from the United States, I pursue four objectives. First, I document the extremely high levels of self-censorship in the contemporary United States. Then I analyze the varied contexts in which people withhold their views, followed by an analysis of why they say they are reluctant to express themselves. In the most important part of my article, I examine the issues on which people are most likely to withhold their views. Distinguishing between expressed public opinion and true public opinion, I then show that on many issues self-censorship results in no ideological bias in expressed views, but on some issues—the Israeli war with Hamas, as the best example—considerable bias exists (true opinion differs from expressed opinion). I conclude with concerns about the deleterious effects of self-censorship on political discussions and deliberations in America.

Political Science Quarterly
Florida State University (US), Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Washington University in St. Louis
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon