Driving Quality Improvement in Gynecology — A Quality Indicator System for China’s County-Level Hospitals

BACKGROUND: Gynecologic diseases are a significant yet often underrecognized global health burden, negatively impacting women's quality of life. In China, county-level public hospitals serve as the primary providers of care or first line of defense for managing these conditions, highlighting the urgent need for improved service quality. However, a systematic framework with specific quality indicators for gynecologic care remains underdeveloped both in China and internationally. Compared with obstetrics, progress in gynecologic care quality assessment has lagged, creating a gap between evidence and practice. The authors aimed to develop and preliminarily implement a quality indicator system to guide gynecologic care quality improvement efforts. METHODS: ]) for each hospital. RESULTS: =4.174, P=0.124). CONCLUSIONS: The authors established mainland China's first validated indicator system for gynecologic care quality. National implementation across 178 hospitals demonstrates the framework's practical utility while revealing significant quality differences across hospital tiers and regions. This standardized evaluation framework provides a practical tool for targeted quality assessment and precision improvement in primary gynecologic care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NEJM Catalyst
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1056/cat.26.0150
Primary Topic
Healthcare Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Driving Quality Improvement in Gynecology — A Quality Indicator System for China’s County-Level Hospitals

Till Bärnighausen, Dian Zeng, Yiwei Weng, Lan Zhu et al.
1 links
NEJM Catalyst
Healthcare Quality and Management
article

Driving Quality Improvement in Gynecology — A Quality Indicator System for China’s County-Level Hospitals

Till Bärnighausen, Dian Zeng, Yiwei Weng, Lan Zhu, Chenyang Pei, Yuanli Liu, Jing Ma, Shen Bingjie, Zixuan Fan, Guangyu Hu, Hua Yang, Haopeng Yang, Runqi Zhang, Lianxue Zhang, Xinyi Zhang, Xin Liu, Gang Wang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gynecologic diseases are a significant yet often underrecognized global health burden, negatively impacting women's quality of life. In China, county-level public hospitals serve as the primary providers of care or first line of defense for managing these conditions, highlighting the urgent need for improved service quality. However, a systematic framework with specific quality indicators for gynecologic care remains underdeveloped both in China and internationally. Compared with obstetrics, progress in gynecologic care quality assessment has lagged, creating a gap between evidence and practice. The authors aimed to develop and preliminarily implement a quality indicator system to guide gynecologic care quality improvement efforts. METHODS: ]) for each hospital. RESULTS: =4.174, P=0.124). CONCLUSIONS: The authors established mainland China's first validated indicator system for gynecologic care quality. National implementation across 178 hospitals demonstrates the framework's practical utility while revealing significant quality differences across hospital tiers and regions. This standardized evaluation framework provides a practical tool for targeted quality assessment and precision improvement in primary gynecologic care.

NEJM CatalystVol. 7(s1)
Harvard University (US), Bengbu Medical College (CN), Jilin University (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Chengdu Medical College (CN), Heidelberg University (DE), Fudan University (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital (CN), Beijing Hospital (CN), Africa Health Research Institute (ZA), National Center for Clinical Laboratories (CN), Dezhou University (CN), Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (DE), Imperial College London (GB), Tsinghua University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Healthcare Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon