Computational Models of Human Intuition

This article from Artificial Intuition Research (AIR) examines three approaches to computationally modelling aspects of human intuition: recognition-based decision-making, the discovery of non-obvious connections through semantic networks, and intuitive response patterns in large language models. Drawing on published research, it explores how these approaches represent different aspects of intuition and what their findings demonstrate. The article highlights an important distinction between computational systems producing outcomes that resemble human intuitive judgments and evidence that they use similar underlying cognitive processes. It discusses the limitations of the studies reviewed and identifies questions for further investigation into computational models of intuition. Developed from exploratory research undertaken during AIR’s Founding Research Internship Cohort, this article has been editorially reviewed and refined for publication. It has not undergone formal journal peer review.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23690671
Primary Topic
Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational Models of Human Intuition

Vishnu Juvva
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
article

Computational Models of Human Intuition

Vishnu Juvva
article en

Abstract

This article from Artificial Intuition Research (AIR) examines three approaches to computationally modelling aspects of human intuition: recognition-based decision-making, the discovery of non-obvious connections through semantic networks, and intuitive response patterns in large language models. Drawing on published research, it explores how these approaches represent different aspects of intuition and what their findings demonstrate. The article highlights an important distinction between computational systems producing outcomes that resemble human intuitive judgments and evidence that they use similar underlying cognitive processes. It discusses the limitations of the studies reviewed and identifies questions for further investigation into computational models of intuition. Developed from exploratory research undertaken during AIR’s Founding Research Internship Cohort, this article has been editorially reviewed and refined for publication. It has not undergone formal journal peer review.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Intuit (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon