The Prague 2025 consensus checklist for reporting indirect outcome studies of Model 1b analytical performance specifications

OBJECTIVES: Analytical performance specifications (APS) based on the Milan Model 1b criteria investigate the impact of analytical performance of a test on clinical classification or decisions, as indirect intermediates to health outcomes of patients. In the lack of guidance for how Model 1b APS should be developed, the objective was to provide generic methodological standards for the design, conduct and reporting of indirect outcome studies for Model 1b APS. METHODS: An interactive workshop followed by several online meetings of experts was organised to discuss the key challenges and limitations of and to develop a checklist of essential reporting elements for Model 1b APS studies. RESULTS: The checklist for reporting Model 1b APS includes 17 essential items with explanatory notes and cross-references to 25 items of the 2025 STAndards for Reporting Diagnostic accuracy studies using artificial intelligence (STARD-AI). CONCLUSIONS: The checklist of essential reporting items will assist the systematic development of Model 1b APS by various statistical or simulation models and ensure that the Model 1b APS are scientifically valid, robust and transferable across different settings and applications in health care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-1472
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Prague 2025 consensus checklist for reporting indirect outcome studies of Model 1b analytical performance specifications

Andrea Rita Horvath, Tze Ping Loh, Sverre Sandberg, Elvar Theodorsson
5 links
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

The Prague 2025 consensus checklist for reporting indirect outcome studies of Model 1b analytical performance specifications

Andrea Rita Horvath, Tze Ping Loh, Sverre Sandberg, Elvar Theodorsson
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Analytical performance specifications (APS) based on the Milan Model 1b criteria investigate the impact of analytical performance of a test on clinical classification or decisions, as indirect intermediates to health outcomes of patients. In the lack of guidance for how Model 1b APS should be developed, the objective was to provide generic methodological standards for the design, conduct and reporting of indirect outcome studies for Model 1b APS. METHODS: An interactive workshop followed by several online meetings of experts was organised to discuss the key challenges and limitations of and to develop a checklist of essential reporting elements for Model 1b APS studies. RESULTS: The checklist for reporting Model 1b APS includes 17 essential items with explanatory notes and cross-references to 25 items of the 2025 STAndards for Reporting Diagnostic accuracy studies using artificial intelligence (STARD-AI). CONCLUSIONS: The checklist of essential reporting items will assist the systematic development of Model 1b APS by various statistical or simulation models and ensure that the Model 1b APS are scientifically valid, robust and transferable across different settings and applications in health care.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Linköping University (SE), The University of Sydney (AU), Haukeland University Hospital (NO), Prince of Wales Hospital (AU), Haraldsplass Diakonale Sykehus (NO), National University Hospital (SG), National University Health System (SG), NSW Health Pathology (AU), University of Bergen (NO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon