Geodetic and gravimetric constraints on regional glacier mass changes in High Mountain Asia

Regional glacier assessments often require mass-change estimates over periods that differ from the intervals measured geodetically. We quantify how native cumulative-mass adjustments and within-interval variation contribute to the regional estimates obtained by adding GRACE. A linear joint inversion represents glacier, lake, non-glacier and exterior mass across High Mountain Asia. Geodetic-only, gravity-only and joint estimates share source geometry, auxiliary observations and temporal regularization. Evaluation uses excluded CryoSat contributor records for complete RGI regions 13 to 15 over January 2011 to January 2015 and January 2015 to January 2019. Joint regional-period mass-rate RMSE is 4.37 Gt yr⁻¹, compared with 8.01 for geodesy and 14.80 for gravity. Adding gravity improves interperiod estimates relative to geodesy, while geodetic constraints mainly reduce the gravity-only mean offset. Under a fixed linear-bridge decomposition, improvement is associated with adjustments to cumulative mass at the native geodetic endpoints. Adding only this component to the geodetic history gives a diagnostic RMSE of 3.43 Gt yr⁻¹; adding only within-interval variation gives 8.51. The joint solution also has substantial geodetic residuals and poorer results in missing-period and local glacier evaluations. The regional gain reflects reconciliation of cumulative mass constraints under the specified decomposition. Evaluating external-period rates alongside native cumulative budgets distinguishes this improvement from recovery of temporal variation within the original geodetic intervals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/x53c04
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Geodetic and gravimetric constraints on regional glacier mass changes in High Mountain Asia

Zhangli Sun, Guyue Hu, Peijun Sun, Yi Xiong et al.
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
preprint

Geodetic and gravimetric constraints on regional glacier mass changes in High Mountain Asia

Zhangli Sun, Guyue Hu, Peijun Sun, Yi Xiong, Lin Tu, Kaihong Huang
preprint en

Abstract

Regional glacier assessments often require mass-change estimates over periods that differ from the intervals measured geodetically. We quantify how native cumulative-mass adjustments and within-interval variation contribute to the regional estimates obtained by adding GRACE. A linear joint inversion represents glacier, lake, non-glacier and exterior mass across High Mountain Asia. Geodetic-only, gravity-only and joint estimates share source geometry, auxiliary observations and temporal regularization. Evaluation uses excluded CryoSat contributor records for complete RGI regions 13 to 15 over January 2011 to January 2015 and January 2015 to January 2019. Joint regional-period mass-rate RMSE is 4.37 Gt yr⁻¹, compared with 8.01 for geodesy and 14.80 for gravity. Adding gravity improves interperiod estimates relative to geodesy, while geodetic constraints mainly reduce the gravity-only mean offset. Under a fixed linear-bridge decomposition, improvement is associated with adjustments to cumulative mass at the native geodetic endpoints. Adding only this component to the geodetic history gives a diagnostic RMSE of 3.43 Gt yr⁻¹; adding only within-interval variation gives 8.51. The joint solution also has substantial geodetic residuals and poorer results in missing-period and local glacier evaluations. The regional gain reflects reconciliation of cumulative mass constraints under the specified decomposition. Evaluating external-period rates alongside native cumulative budgets distinguishes this improvement from recovery of temporal variation within the original geodetic intervals.

Planetary Science Institute (US), Chengdu University of Technology (CN), Northwest University (CN)
Climate action
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon