Failure Mode and Effects Analysis of the In-Hospital Medication Process: Identification of Systemic Risks and development of Improvement strategies

BACKGROUND: Flaws in the in-hospital medication process compromise patient safety. A structured evaluation of the process using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) can identify and prioritize potential risks and help to develop targeted measures to improve medication safety. METHODS: A prospective risk analysis using FMEA was conducted between February 2025 and February 2026 in a large tertiary care hospital by an interprofessional team including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and a chief risk manager. In six structured workshops, the medication process was analyzed including admission, prescribing, order/delivery, dispensing, and discharge. Potential failure modes, their causes, and effects were identified based on expert experience and known errors from the hospitals critical incident reporting system. Each failure mode was independently rated for severity, occurrence, and detectability on a 5-point scale. Risk Priority Numbers (RPN) were calculated to prioritize risks. Based on these results, targeted mitigation strategies were developed. RESULTS: A total of 101 potential failure modes were identified, with the highest proportion in admission (n = 37; 36.6%). RPN values were moderate (median 22; IQR 14-29; range 8-53). The highest ranked risks were missing drug interaction checks (RPN = 53) and lack of dose adjustment in renal impairment (RPN = 46). Additional high-risk areas included incomplete medication histories and communication deficits at process interfaces. Contributing factors were predominantly related to human and communication domains. Mitigation strategies included standardized medication reconciliation procedures, training programs for medical staff, pharmacist consultation service, and system level interventions such as software improvements and improved communication processes. CONCLUSION: The FMEA identified specific risks within the in-hospital medication process. Furthermore, it revealed interdependencies between process stages and system level vulnerabilities. The derived measures may contribute to improved medication safety across multiple stages of care in similar hospital settings. Future studies should evaluate their implementation and impact on medication errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzag179
Primary Topic
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis of the In-Hospital Medication Process: Identification of Systemic Risks and development of Improvement strategies

Isabel Brinkmann, Catherine Glocker, Dorothea Strobach, Stefan Kääb et al.
International Journal for Quality in Health Care
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
article

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis of the In-Hospital Medication Process: Identification of Systemic Risks and development of Improvement strategies

Isabel Brinkmann, Catherine Glocker, Dorothea Strobach, Stefan Kääb, Maximilian Günther, Martin Göring, Josef Hollmann, Ute Amann, Vera Smolka, Julian Steinbrech, Tobias Rüther, Caroline Rosch, Christian Hermann, Angela Herold
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Flaws in the in-hospital medication process compromise patient safety. A structured evaluation of the process using Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) can identify and prioritize potential risks and help to develop targeted measures to improve medication safety. METHODS: A prospective risk analysis using FMEA was conducted between February 2025 and February 2026 in a large tertiary care hospital by an interprofessional team including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and a chief risk manager. In six structured workshops, the medication process was analyzed including admission, prescribing, order/delivery, dispensing, and discharge. Potential failure modes, their causes, and effects were identified based on expert experience and known errors from the hospitals critical incident reporting system. Each failure mode was independently rated for severity, occurrence, and detectability on a 5-point scale. Risk Priority Numbers (RPN) were calculated to prioritize risks. Based on these results, targeted mitigation strategies were developed. RESULTS: A total of 101 potential failure modes were identified, with the highest proportion in admission (n = 37; 36.6%). RPN values were moderate (median 22; IQR 14-29; range 8-53). The highest ranked risks were missing drug interaction checks (RPN = 53) and lack of dose adjustment in renal impairment (RPN = 46). Additional high-risk areas included incomplete medication histories and communication deficits at process interfaces. Contributing factors were predominantly related to human and communication domains. Mitigation strategies included standardized medication reconciliation procedures, training programs for medical staff, pharmacist consultation service, and system level interventions such as software improvements and improved communication processes. CONCLUSION: The FMEA identified specific risks within the in-hospital medication process. Furthermore, it revealed interdependencies between process stages and system level vulnerabilities. The derived measures may contribute to improved medication safety across multiple stages of care in similar hospital settings. Future studies should evaluate their implementation and impact on medication errors.

International Journal for Quality in Health Care
LMU Klinikum (DE), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Patient Safety and Medication Errors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon