Exact Multi-Source Evaluation for National-Scale EV Charging Station Placement: How Far Does Surrogate Assistance Take Us?

Selecting facility locations on a national road network requires evaluating, for every candidate configuration, the shortest-path distance from each demand node to its nearest facility. We show that this objective admits a single multi-source shortest-path sweep rather than K independent single-source Dijkstra searches, which reduces the cost of one exact evaluation on the Great Britain network (12.8 million nodes, 5.4 million demand points) from an estimated 158 s to about 1 s and makes a fully exact national-scale baseline computationally tractable. We build this exact evaluator and use it as a benchmark for surrogate-assisted multi-objective optimization. We propose GP-SA-MOEA, a Gaussian process surrogate-assisted multi-objective evolutionary algorithm that replaces most expensive distance evaluations with a learned surrogate while correcting it through uncertainty-guided active learning. On a London benchmark with a computable exactly evaluated reference front, GP-SA-MOEA recovers a diverse front (hypervolume ratio 0.995), whereas a pure surrogate without active learning spuriously dominates the reference front by underestimating distances. At national scale, an exactly evaluated NSGA-II baseline built on this evaluator attains a better Pareto front than GP-SA-MOEA at lower cost (mean IGD 556 vs. 4378, in 1.3 h vs. 5.9 h), and the Euclidean proxy is the closer of the two surrogates in aggregate mean. We therefore ask when surrogate assistance is still worthwhile, and answer with a topology-sensitive benchmark: geometric (Euclidean) assignment fails systematically where water barriers and one-way restrictions make network distance diverge from straight-line distance, selecting the wrong facility for every cross-water demand node on both network versions. These findings position the multi-source exact evaluator as a practical route to large-scale multi-objective facility location and delimit the role of surrogate assistance in this setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19215095
Primary Topic
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exact Multi-Source Evaluation for National-Scale EV Charging Station Placement: How Far Does Surrogate Assistance Take Us?

Tianyong Wu, Tianyu Lan, Ran Zhan, Chunyuan Zhang
Energies
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
article

Exact Multi-Source Evaluation for National-Scale EV Charging Station Placement: How Far Does Surrogate Assistance Take Us?

Tianyong Wu, Tianyu Lan, Ran Zhan, Chunyuan Zhang
article en

Abstract

Selecting facility locations on a national road network requires evaluating, for every candidate configuration, the shortest-path distance from each demand node to its nearest facility. We show that this objective admits a single multi-source shortest-path sweep rather than K independent single-source Dijkstra searches, which reduces the cost of one exact evaluation on the Great Britain network (12.8 million nodes, 5.4 million demand points) from an estimated 158 s to about 1 s and makes a fully exact national-scale baseline computationally tractable. We build this exact evaluator and use it as a benchmark for surrogate-assisted multi-objective optimization. We propose GP-SA-MOEA, a Gaussian process surrogate-assisted multi-objective evolutionary algorithm that replaces most expensive distance evaluations with a learned surrogate while correcting it through uncertainty-guided active learning. On a London benchmark with a computable exactly evaluated reference front, GP-SA-MOEA recovers a diverse front (hypervolume ratio 0.995), whereas a pure surrogate without active learning spuriously dominates the reference front by underestimating distances. At national scale, an exactly evaluated NSGA-II baseline built on this evaluator attains a better Pareto front than GP-SA-MOEA at lower cost (mean IGD 556 vs. 4378, in 1.3 h vs. 5.9 h), and the Euclidean proxy is the closer of the two surrogates in aggregate mean. We therefore ask when surrogate assistance is still worthwhile, and answer with a topology-sensitive benchmark: geometric (Euclidean) assignment fails systematically where water barriers and one-way restrictions make network distance diverge from straight-line distance, selecting the wrong facility for every cross-water demand node on both network versions. These findings position the multi-source exact evaluator as a practical route to large-scale multi-objective facility location and delimit the role of surrogate assistance in this setting.

EnergiesVol. 19(21)
University of Bristol (GB), Hubei Polytechnic University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon