Assessing stigma and perceptions of respectful care in Malawi’s index case testing program: Findings from a cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Healthcare worker (HCW) HIV-related stigma can reduce participation in HIV prevention services in Malawi, including HIV index testing. However, evidence on interventions to reduce HCW stigma and improve client experiences of care in index testing settings remains limited. We evaluated HCW stigmatizing attitudes and also assessed anticipated stigma and perceptions of respectful care among both people living with HIV (index clients) and their sexual partners (contact clients) in index testing settings. METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial across 33 clusters providing index case testing in southeastern Malawi. All HCWs received standard, in-person training. Enhanced cluster HCWs additionally received the blended learning training package consisting of tablet-based modules and in-person sessions incorporating stigma-reduction content. HCW stigmatizing attitudes were evaluated one-month (wave 1) and one-year post-training (wave 2). A subset of index and contact clients completed anticipated stigma and respectful care scales at exit interviews. Scales ranged from 0-3 (HCW stigma), 0-1 (anticipated stigma), and 1-5 (respectful care), with higher scores reflecting more stigma or respectful care. Generalized estimating equations with an identity link and gamma distribution estimated adjusted mean differences between arms. RESULTS: We enrolled 305 HCWs, 341 index clients, and 194 contact clients. Overall stigma levels were low and respectful care ratings were high across arms. Mean HCW stigma scores were 0.8 (wave 1) and 0.7 (wave 2); adjusted mean differences between arms were -0.1 (p = 0.3) at wave 1 and 0.0 (p = 1.0) at wave 2. Index and contact client anticipated stigma means were both 0.1; adjusted mean differences between arms were 0.0 (p = 0.9) for index and 0.0 (p = 0.7) for contact clients. Respectful care means were 4.0 for index and 4.2 for contact clients; adjusted mean differences between arms were 0.0 (p = 0.9) for index and -0.1 (p = 0.3) for contact clients. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced training package did not improve HCW or client stigma-related outcomes. Further research is needed to reduce HCW and client stigma and improve respectful care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345705
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing stigma and perceptions of respectful care in Malawi’s index case testing program: Findings from a cluster randomized controlled trial

Nora Ellen Rosenberg, Tapiwa A Tembo, Katie R. Mollan, Laura C. Nyblade et al.
2 links
PLoS ONE
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

Assessing stigma and perceptions of respectful care in Malawi’s index case testing program: Findings from a cluster randomized controlled trial

Nora Ellen Rosenberg, Tapiwa A Tembo, Katie R. Mollan, Laura C. Nyblade, Angella Mkandawire, Mike Chitani, Milenka Jean‐Baptiste, Vivian Fei-ling Go, Jiayu Wang, Caroline Kumbuyo, H. Luz McNaughton Reyes, Abigail M. Hatcher, Katherine Simon, Ireen Chirombo, Maria H. Kim
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Healthcare worker (HCW) HIV-related stigma can reduce participation in HIV prevention services in Malawi, including HIV index testing. However, evidence on interventions to reduce HCW stigma and improve client experiences of care in index testing settings remains limited. We evaluated HCW stigmatizing attitudes and also assessed anticipated stigma and perceptions of respectful care among both people living with HIV (index clients) and their sexual partners (contact clients) in index testing settings. METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial across 33 clusters providing index case testing in southeastern Malawi. All HCWs received standard, in-person training. Enhanced cluster HCWs additionally received the blended learning training package consisting of tablet-based modules and in-person sessions incorporating stigma-reduction content. HCW stigmatizing attitudes were evaluated one-month (wave 1) and one-year post-training (wave 2). A subset of index and contact clients completed anticipated stigma and respectful care scales at exit interviews. Scales ranged from 0-3 (HCW stigma), 0-1 (anticipated stigma), and 1-5 (respectful care), with higher scores reflecting more stigma or respectful care. Generalized estimating equations with an identity link and gamma distribution estimated adjusted mean differences between arms. RESULTS: We enrolled 305 HCWs, 341 index clients, and 194 contact clients. Overall stigma levels were low and respectful care ratings were high across arms. Mean HCW stigma scores were 0.8 (wave 1) and 0.7 (wave 2); adjusted mean differences between arms were -0.1 (p = 0.3) at wave 1 and 0.0 (p = 1.0) at wave 2. Index and contact client anticipated stigma means were both 0.1; adjusted mean differences between arms were 0.0 (p = 0.9) for index and 0.0 (p = 0.7) for contact clients. Respectful care means were 4.0 for index and 4.2 for contact clients; adjusted mean differences between arms were 0.0 (p = 0.9) for index and -0.1 (p = 0.3) for contact clients. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced training package did not improve HCW or client stigma-related outcomes. Further research is needed to reduce HCW and client stigma and improve respectful care.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
U.S. Department of State, United States Agency for International Development, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Gilead Sciences, U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, Hill's Pet Nutrition, National Institutes of Health, Center for AIDS Research, University of Washington, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for AIDS Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon