Expert consensus on neuro‐musculoskeletal functional reconstruction for post‐stroke spastic hemiplegia

Abstract Persistent motor dysfunction in post‐stroke spastic hemiplegia may result from impaired voluntary motor control, abnormal muscle overactivity, fixed structural restriction, muscle force imbalance, or their combination. Advances in brain–computer interfaces (BCIs), peripheral nerve surgery, and tendon and soft‐tissue reconstruction have expanded therapeutic options, yet optimal indications and sequencing remain unclear. A multidisciplinary expert panel reviewed current evidence, addressed key clinical questions, and developed consensus recommendations for noninvasive BCI, diagnostic motor nerve block (DNB), selective or hyperselective peripheral nerve surgery, and reconstructive procedures. The consensus emphasizes evaluation of four major components: central voluntary motor impairment, dynamic abnormal muscle overactivity, fixed structural limitations, and muscle force imbalance. Treatment should be guided by the patient's functional goals and the primary factor restricting performance. Task‐oriented motor training remains fundamental when voluntary motor control is impaired, with BCI‐based closed‐loop training as a potential adjunct in selected patients. Focal, functionally significant muscle overactivity caused by abnormal neural drive may be considered for selective or hyperselective peripheral nerve surgery, with DNB assisting patient selection. Fixed structural restrictions may require tendon or soft‐tissue procedures, while muscle force imbalance may benefit from tendon transfer or other dynamic reconstruction. When multiple impairments coexist, combined reconstruction followed by targeted motor retraining and comprehensive reassessment may be appropriate. Overall, neuro‐musculoskeletal functional reconstruction should follow an individualized pathway linking functional goals, dominant pathophysiology, treatment targets, and outcomes. Given the variable evidence quality, no universal treatment sequence or combination strategy is currently supported.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ibrain
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ibra.70032
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert consensus on neuro‐musculoskeletal functional reconstruction for post‐stroke spastic hemiplegia

Kaifeng Wu, Guoguang Zhao, Liu‐Lin Xiong, Y.-Z. Wang et al.
Ibrain
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Expert consensus on neuro‐musculoskeletal functional reconstruction for post‐stroke spastic hemiplegia

Kaifeng Wu, Guoguang Zhao, Liu‐Lin Xiong, Y.-Z. Wang, Peng Wen, Chunbing Chen, Xiaohong Fu, Zhizhong Zhu, Zhongzheng He
article en

Abstract

Abstract Persistent motor dysfunction in post‐stroke spastic hemiplegia may result from impaired voluntary motor control, abnormal muscle overactivity, fixed structural restriction, muscle force imbalance, or their combination. Advances in brain–computer interfaces (BCIs), peripheral nerve surgery, and tendon and soft‐tissue reconstruction have expanded therapeutic options, yet optimal indications and sequencing remain unclear. A multidisciplinary expert panel reviewed current evidence, addressed key clinical questions, and developed consensus recommendations for noninvasive BCI, diagnostic motor nerve block (DNB), selective or hyperselective peripheral nerve surgery, and reconstructive procedures. The consensus emphasizes evaluation of four major components: central voluntary motor impairment, dynamic abnormal muscle overactivity, fixed structural limitations, and muscle force imbalance. Treatment should be guided by the patient's functional goals and the primary factor restricting performance. Task‐oriented motor training remains fundamental when voluntary motor control is impaired, with BCI‐based closed‐loop training as a potential adjunct in selected patients. Focal, functionally significant muscle overactivity caused by abnormal neural drive may be considered for selective or hyperselective peripheral nerve surgery, with DNB assisting patient selection. Fixed structural restrictions may require tendon or soft‐tissue procedures, while muscle force imbalance may benefit from tendon transfer or other dynamic reconstruction. When multiple impairments coexist, combined reconstruction followed by targeted motor retraining and comprehensive reassessment may be appropriate. Overall, neuro‐musculoskeletal functional reconstruction should follow an individualized pathway linking functional goals, dominant pathophysiology, treatment targets, and outcomes. Given the variable evidence quality, no universal treatment sequence or combination strategy is currently supported.

Ibrain
Capital Medical University (CN), Xuan Wu Hospital of the Capital Medical University (CN), Tianjin Huanhu Hospital (CN), First People’s Hospital of Zunyi (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon