Multisource remote sensing and geospatial analysis of vineyard wildfire impacts and exposure: the 2019 Kincade Fire

Working agricultural landscapes are often treated as background to wildfire disasters, even though they are managed fuel mosaics, productive assets, and parts of regional infrastructure systems. We examine vineyard wildfire impacts and exposure during the electrically initiated 2019 Kincade Fire in Sonoma County, California, using an open, event-anchored geospatial framework spanning 4,581 vineyard fields (8,813.2 ha), wildland vegetation, surveyed structures, roads, overhead smoke, and post-fire greenness. Sentinel-2 spectral response, OpenET evapotranspiration, gridMET fire weather, USDA soils, USGS terrain, NOAA smoke polygons, an ignition-date OpenStreetMap network, and three-dimensional data inventories were analyzed at their native decision scales. Vineyard pixels displayed substantially lower descriptive dNBR than wildland pixels inside the perimeter (means 0.130 and 0.337, respectively). Yet this landscape contrast did not identify a universal vineyard firebreak effect. A segment-clustered boundary model yielded a small negative contrast at 100 m (tau = −0.0166) but changed across bandwidths, failed slope continuity, disappeared in a 100 m donut specification, and produced a large wrong-signed placebo estimate. A 250 m spatial generalized additive model showed a negative vineyard-fraction association: after conditioning on location, terrain, and water use, the joint-smooth coefficient was −0.111, and residual Moran’s I was 0.611. Beyond direct spectral impact, all mapped vineyards intersected overhead smoke on at least 1 day (mean 7.78 potential smoke-days per field), 34.2% of road-network nodes were dead ends, and vineyards within the perimeter showed a larger greenness deficit through 2021 (recovery ratios 0.815 inside and 0.854 outside). Lower immediate spectral change did not establish vine survival or recovery of agricultural function. The study offers a reproducible urban–rural informatics template that separates descriptive contrasts, conditional associations, exposure indicators, and recovery evidence for decision-making in working landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sustainability
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2026.1997548
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multisource remote sensing and geospatial analysis of vineyard wildfire impacts and exposure: the 2019 Kincade Fire

Mohammadreza Narimani, Mahla Ardebili Pour, Parastoo Farajpoor, Mohammad Ghiasi
Frontiers in Sustainability
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

Multisource remote sensing and geospatial analysis of vineyard wildfire impacts and exposure: the 2019 Kincade Fire

Mohammadreza Narimani, Mahla Ardebili Pour, Parastoo Farajpoor, Mohammad Ghiasi
article en

Abstract

Working agricultural landscapes are often treated as background to wildfire disasters, even though they are managed fuel mosaics, productive assets, and parts of regional infrastructure systems. We examine vineyard wildfire impacts and exposure during the electrically initiated 2019 Kincade Fire in Sonoma County, California, using an open, event-anchored geospatial framework spanning 4,581 vineyard fields (8,813.2 ha), wildland vegetation, surveyed structures, roads, overhead smoke, and post-fire greenness. Sentinel-2 spectral response, OpenET evapotranspiration, gridMET fire weather, USDA soils, USGS terrain, NOAA smoke polygons, an ignition-date OpenStreetMap network, and three-dimensional data inventories were analyzed at their native decision scales. Vineyard pixels displayed substantially lower descriptive dNBR than wildland pixels inside the perimeter (means 0.130 and 0.337, respectively). Yet this landscape contrast did not identify a universal vineyard firebreak effect. A segment-clustered boundary model yielded a small negative contrast at 100 m (tau = −0.0166) but changed across bandwidths, failed slope continuity, disappeared in a 100 m donut specification, and produced a large wrong-signed placebo estimate. A 250 m spatial generalized additive model showed a negative vineyard-fraction association: after conditioning on location, terrain, and water use, the joint-smooth coefficient was −0.111, and residual Moran’s I was 0.611. Beyond direct spectral impact, all mapped vineyards intersected overhead smoke on at least 1 day (mean 7.78 potential smoke-days per field), 34.2% of road-network nodes were dead ends, and vineyards within the perimeter showed a larger greenness deficit through 2021 (recovery ratios 0.815 inside and 0.854 outside). Lower immediate spectral change did not establish vine survival or recovery of agricultural function. The study offers a reproducible urban–rural informatics template that separates descriptive contrasts, conditional associations, exposure indicators, and recovery evidence for decision-making in working landscapes.

Frontiers in SustainabilityVol. 7
University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon