Dual exclusion: Mobility poverty and democratic representation in participatory governance

Those with the fewest mobility options are often the least heard in decisions about mobility. We call this “dual exclusion”: mobility poverty and democratic underrepresentation are co-constituted and mutually reinforcing, obstructing a sustainable mobility transformation. We show how participation formats can be redesigned to break this cycle.Vulnerable populations often face exclusion from democratic processes in the context of sustainable mobility transformations. We introduce the notion of “dual exclusion” to capture how barriers to political articulation and everyday mobility reinforce each other to obstruct democratic representation in citizen deliberations on mobility policy. Drawing on democratic representation theory and intersectionality, we redefine participatory formats as requiring proactive inclusion. Through qualitative interviews, we explore prevailing representation practices, identify structural limits, and derive design principles for participation formats capable of overcoming dual exclusion. The paper offers practice-oriented recommendations linking participatory governance and democratic theory to disrupt cycles of social exclusion and mobility poverty.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.35.s1.8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political Theory and Democracy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual exclusion: Mobility poverty and democratic representation in participatory governance

Antonia Graf, Tomma Wagner
1 citations
GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society
Political Theory and Democracy
19.62
article

Dual exclusion: Mobility poverty and democratic representation in participatory governance

Antonia Graf, Tomma Wagner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Those with the fewest mobility options are often the least heard in decisions about mobility. We call this “dual exclusion”: mobility poverty and democratic underrepresentation are co-constituted and mutually reinforcing, obstructing a sustainable mobility transformation. We show how participation formats can be redesigned to break this cycle.Vulnerable populations often face exclusion from democratic processes in the context of sustainable mobility transformations. We introduce the notion of “dual exclusion” to capture how barriers to political articulation and everyday mobility reinforce each other to obstruct democratic representation in citizen deliberations on mobility policy. Drawing on democratic representation theory and intersectionality, we redefine participatory formats as requiring proactive inclusion. Through qualitative interviews, we explore prevailing representation practices, identify structural limits, and derive design principles for participation formats capable of overcoming dual exclusion. The paper offers practice-oriented recommendations linking participatory governance and democratic theory to disrupt cycles of social exclusion and mobility poverty.

GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and SocietyVol. 35(1)
Reduced inequalities, Sustainable cities and communities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Political Theory and Democracy
19.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon