Real-World Treatment Patterns and Sequencing of ALK-Inhibitors in ALK-Positive NSCLC Treated with Palliative Intent

Background: ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a molecularly defined subtype that is highly sensitive to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK inhibitors). With multiple generations of ALK inhibitors available, real-world data on treatment patterns and sequencing in routine clinical practice remain limited. Methods: This retrospective multicenter registry analysis included patients with ALK-positive NSCLC treated with palliative intent and enrolled in the LALUCA registry between November 2020 and September 2025 at four lung cancer centers in Vienna. ALK alterations were confirmed by next-generation sequencing. Demographic, clinical, and treatment-related data were analyzed descriptively. Results: Twenty-eight patients were included (median age, 54 years [range, 26–84]; 46.4% female). Most patients had stage IV disease (85.7%) and adenocarcinoma histology (92.9%). Overall, 49 systemic treatment lines were administered, including 41 ALK inhibitor treatment lines (22 second-generation and 19 third-generation). At data cut-off, 39.0% of ALK inhibitor treatment lines were ongoing, with a higher proportion of ongoing treatment observed among third-generation compared with second-generation ALK inhibitors (52.6% vs. 27.3%). The Kaplan–Meier-estimated median treatment duration was 287 days (95% CI, 172-NE) for second-generation and 736 days (95% CI, 376–NE) for third-generation ALK inhibitors. Objective response rates were 77.3% and 73.7%, respectively. Adverse events of any grade occurred in 73.2% of treatment lines, while grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 12.2%. Dose reductions and temporary treatment interruptions were used to manage toxicity and allowed for treatment continuation in most affected treatment lines. Conclusions: This multicenter real-world analysis provides insights into contemporary ALK inhibitor treatment patterns and sequencing in routine clinical practice. Third-generation ALK inhibitors were associated with longer observed treatment durations in this cohort, although these findings should be interpreted cautiously given the small sample size, retrospective analysis, and potential differences in treatment selection and follow-up. Overall, toxicity was generally manageable, with dose modifications and temporary treatment interruptions frequently allowing for continuation of ALK inhibitor therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18213470
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Sequencing of ALK-Inhibitors in ALK-Positive NSCLC Treated with Palliative Intent

Arschang Valipour, Anna Sophie Lang-Stöberl, Robab Breyer‐Kohansal, Marie‐Kathrin Breyer et al.
1 links
Cancers
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Sequencing of ALK-Inhibitors in ALK-Positive NSCLC Treated with Palliative Intent

Arschang Valipour, Anna Sophie Lang-Stöberl, Robab Breyer‐Kohansal, Marie‐Kathrin Breyer, Maximilian Johannes Hochmair, Julie Krainer, Hannah Fabikan, Leyla Ay, Nino Müser, Christoph Weinlinger, Vania Mikaela Rodriguez
article en

Abstract

Background: ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a molecularly defined subtype that is highly sensitive to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK inhibitors). With multiple generations of ALK inhibitors available, real-world data on treatment patterns and sequencing in routine clinical practice remain limited. Methods: This retrospective multicenter registry analysis included patients with ALK-positive NSCLC treated with palliative intent and enrolled in the LALUCA registry between November 2020 and September 2025 at four lung cancer centers in Vienna. ALK alterations were confirmed by next-generation sequencing. Demographic, clinical, and treatment-related data were analyzed descriptively. Results: Twenty-eight patients were included (median age, 54 years [range, 26–84]; 46.4% female). Most patients had stage IV disease (85.7%) and adenocarcinoma histology (92.9%). Overall, 49 systemic treatment lines were administered, including 41 ALK inhibitor treatment lines (22 second-generation and 19 third-generation). At data cut-off, 39.0% of ALK inhibitor treatment lines were ongoing, with a higher proportion of ongoing treatment observed among third-generation compared with second-generation ALK inhibitors (52.6% vs. 27.3%). The Kaplan–Meier-estimated median treatment duration was 287 days (95% CI, 172-NE) for second-generation and 736 days (95% CI, 376–NE) for third-generation ALK inhibitors. Objective response rates were 77.3% and 73.7%, respectively. Adverse events of any grade occurred in 73.2% of treatment lines, while grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 12.2%. Dose reductions and temporary treatment interruptions were used to manage toxicity and allowed for treatment continuation in most affected treatment lines. Conclusions: This multicenter real-world analysis provides insights into contemporary ALK inhibitor treatment patterns and sequencing in routine clinical practice. Third-generation ALK inhibitors were associated with longer observed treatment durations in this cohort, although these findings should be interpreted cautiously given the small sample size, retrospective analysis, and potential differences in treatment selection and follow-up. Overall, toxicity was generally manageable, with dose modifications and temporary treatment interruptions frequently allowing for continuation of ALK inhibitor therapy.

CancersVol. 18(21)
Klinik Hietzing (AT), Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Lung Vascular Research (AT), Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for COPD And Respiratory Epidemiology (AT), Karl Landsteiner Society (AT), Institut für Lungenforschung (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon