Requirements and key factors for the successful implementation of AI in clinical practice: a qualitative study from the European CAIDX network

Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to become increasingly important in hospitals and clinical care. However, successful implementation depends on technical, organizational, and user-related factors. We aimed to identify the key requirements for equitable and effective adoption of AI-based applications in clinical practice. Methods Within the “ Clinical AI-based Diagnostics” (CAIDX) project, we conducted systematic expert interviews with 55 stakeholders from four European countries working across the healthcare sector. Interviews explored the perceived added value of AI, barriers to implementation, usability requirements, and potential health-economic implications. Results Stakeholder analysis revealed several recurrent sources of tension affecting implementation: limited physician involvement, differing perspectives between IT specialists and clinicians, unclear distribution of tasks and responsibilities, and low institutional commitment driven by concerns about inefficient use of time and resources. We also identified structural and workforce-related constraints that make implementation particularly challenging, including the large number of actors involved and the highly individual organizational setup of hospitals, which limits transferability of implementation models. Discussion Implementation of clinical AI requires targeted action at hospital, vendor, and health-system levels. Compared with earlier healthcare technologies, AI adoption is shaped more strongly by AI literacy, professional attitudes, and perceptions of trust and responsibility. Based on these findings, we propose practical recommendations to support implementation of AI applications in routine care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Digital Health
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2026.1954586
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Requirements and key factors for the successful implementation of AI in clinical practice: a qualitative study from the European CAIDX network

Jaanus Pikani, Stefan Johannes Teipel, Surenth Nalliah, Martin Dyrba et al.
4 links
Frontiers in Digital Health
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Requirements and key factors for the successful implementation of AI in clinical practice: a qualitative study from the European CAIDX network

Jaanus Pikani, Stefan Johannes Teipel, Surenth Nalliah, Martin Dyrba, Krzysztof Tupikowski, Stefan V. Jovinge, Stina B. Jonasson, Doreen Göerß, Carina Østervig Byskov, Ida Lyngholm
article en

Abstract

Introduction Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to become increasingly important in hospitals and clinical care. However, successful implementation depends on technical, organizational, and user-related factors. We aimed to identify the key requirements for equitable and effective adoption of AI-based applications in clinical practice. Methods Within the “ Clinical AI-based Diagnostics” (CAIDX) project, we conducted systematic expert interviews with 55 stakeholders from four European countries working across the healthcare sector. Interviews explored the perceived added value of AI, barriers to implementation, usability requirements, and potential health-economic implications. Results Stakeholder analysis revealed several recurrent sources of tension affecting implementation: limited physician involvement, differing perspectives between IT specialists and clinicians, unclear distribution of tasks and responsibilities, and low institutional commitment driven by concerns about inefficient use of time and resources. We also identified structural and workforce-related constraints that make implementation particularly challenging, including the large number of actors involved and the highly individual organizational setup of hospitals, which limits transferability of implementation models. Discussion Implementation of clinical AI requires targeted action at hospital, vendor, and health-system levels. Compared with earlier healthcare technologies, AI adoption is shaped more strongly by AI literacy, professional attitudes, and perceptions of trust and responsibility. Based on these findings, we propose practical recommendations to support implementation of AI applications in routine care.

Frontiers in Digital HealthVol. 8
Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Tartu Biotechnology Park (EE), Universitätsmedizin Rostock (DE), Skåne University Hospital (SE), German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Dresden (DE), Stanford Cardiovascular Institute (US), Aalborg University (DK), Stanford University (US)
European Commission, Interreg
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon