Diamond Open Access in the United Arab Emirates (UAE): Awareness, perceptions, and institutional readiness for equitable scholarly publishing

Diamond Open Access (OA) provides a non-commercial and equity-oriented alternative to fee-based scholarly publishing, yet empirical evidence on stakeholder awareness and institutional readiness in the Gulf region remains limited. This study examined awareness, perceived benefits, institutional readiness, implementation challenges, and equity-related perceptions of Diamond OA among librarians and faculty members in public and private universities in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was employed, with a convenience sample yielding 101 valid responses. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, internal-consistency reliability analysis, EFA, Mann–Whitney U tests, Spearman’s rank-order correlations, and multiple linear regression. Respondents expressed strong support for the equity-oriented principles of Diamond OA, particularly geo-linguistic equity ( M = 3.82) and ethical and justice considerations ( M = 3.78). However, institutional readiness ( M = 3.23) and awareness ( M = 3.33) were comparatively lower, indicating that normative support exceeded perceived institutional preparedness. Awareness and perceived benefits were positively associated with institutional readiness and emerged as significant independent predictors, with the full model explaining 56.3% of the variance in readiness ( R 2 = 0.563, F (5, 95) = 24.52, p < 0.001). Equity, ethical, and geo-linguistic perceptions were highly intercorrelated, suggesting an overarching values-and-equity orientation rather than clearly differentiated empirical dimensions. Private-university respondents reported significantly greater implementation challenges than their public-university counterparts, whereas no significant differences were observed by professional role or gender. The findings indicate broad stakeholder support for Diamond OA principles in the UAE, but comparatively limited awareness and institutional preparedness. Strengthening awareness and training should therefore be accompanied by structural measures, including dedicated funding, multilingual publishing infrastructure, recognition of editorial labor, and integration of Diamond OA into research assessment and promotion systems. The study provides exploratory stakeholder-based evidence to inform Diamond OA policy and capacity-building in the UAE and the wider Gulf Cooperation Council region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006261498045
Primary Topic
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diamond Open Access in the United Arab Emirates (UAE): Awareness, perceptions, and institutional readiness for equitable scholarly publishing

Zafar Imam Khan
3 links
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
article

Diamond Open Access in the United Arab Emirates (UAE): Awareness, perceptions, and institutional readiness for equitable scholarly publishing

Zafar Imam Khan
article en

Abstract

Diamond Open Access (OA) provides a non-commercial and equity-oriented alternative to fee-based scholarly publishing, yet empirical evidence on stakeholder awareness and institutional readiness in the Gulf region remains limited. This study examined awareness, perceived benefits, institutional readiness, implementation challenges, and equity-related perceptions of Diamond OA among librarians and faculty members in public and private universities in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was employed, with a convenience sample yielding 101 valid responses. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, internal-consistency reliability analysis, EFA, Mann–Whitney U tests, Spearman’s rank-order correlations, and multiple linear regression. Respondents expressed strong support for the equity-oriented principles of Diamond OA, particularly geo-linguistic equity ( M = 3.82) and ethical and justice considerations ( M = 3.78). However, institutional readiness ( M = 3.23) and awareness ( M = 3.33) were comparatively lower, indicating that normative support exceeded perceived institutional preparedness. Awareness and perceived benefits were positively associated with institutional readiness and emerged as significant independent predictors, with the full model explaining 56.3% of the variance in readiness ( R 2 = 0.563, F (5, 95) = 24.52, p < 0.001). Equity, ethical, and geo-linguistic perceptions were highly intercorrelated, suggesting an overarching values-and-equity orientation rather than clearly differentiated empirical dimensions. Private-university respondents reported significantly greater implementation challenges than their public-university counterparts, whereas no significant differences were observed by professional role or gender. The findings indicate broad stakeholder support for Diamond OA principles in the UAE, but comparatively limited awareness and institutional preparedness. Strengthening awareness and training should therefore be accompanied by structural measures, including dedicated funding, multilingual publishing infrastructure, recognition of editorial labor, and integration of Diamond OA into research assessment and promotion systems. The study provides exploratory stakeholder-based evidence to inform Diamond OA policy and capacity-building in the UAE and the wider Gulf Cooperation Council region.

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University (AE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon