Why energy poverty persists: Multidimensional evidence from contrasting energy transitions in Tanzania and Vietnam

Expanding access to modern energy does not necessarily eliminate energy poverty. Even as incomes rise and energy access improves for many households, others may continue to experience deprivation across essential energy services. Yet relatively little is known about the forms this persistence takes and how they differ across energy-transition contexts. Using nationally representative household data from Tanzania and Vietnam from 2008 to 2020, we examine these patterns through a multidimensional energy poverty index. We assess changes in the incidence, intensity, dimensions, and distribution of energy poverty, estimate household-level correlates using Tobit and Logit models, and apply an Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition to the cross-country energy-deprivation gap. Energy poverty declined substantially in both countries, but persistence differed markedly. Tanzania exhibited broad persistence, with deprivation remaining widespread and severe despite major gains in electricity access, while Vietnam exhibited more residual and concentrated persistence following a rapid decline in aggregate energy poverty. Unclean cooking fuels remained the most persistent deprivation in both countries. Income, education, urban residence, and non-farm employment were associated with lower energy deprivation, while farming was associated with greater deprivation. Observable household characteristics accounted for 27.4% of the cross-country gap, indicating that differences in socioeconomic endowments alone do not account for the contrasting outcomes. Policy responses should therefore distinguish electrification from clean-cooking transitions and adapt targeting to the form of persistence. This requires broad multidimensional interventions where deprivation remains widespread and targeted support where it is residual and concentrated, particularly among rural and consumption-poor households and for persistent cooking deprivation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.105042
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why energy poverty persists: Multidimensional evidence from contrasting energy transitions in Tanzania and Vietnam

Musharavati Ephraim Munyanyi, Nguyet T.M. Tran, Ulrike Grote, Thành Tâm Nguyên
4 links
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

Why energy poverty persists: Multidimensional evidence from contrasting energy transitions in Tanzania and Vietnam

Musharavati Ephraim Munyanyi, Nguyet T.M. Tran, Ulrike Grote, Thành Tâm Nguyên
article en

Abstract

Expanding access to modern energy does not necessarily eliminate energy poverty. Even as incomes rise and energy access improves for many households, others may continue to experience deprivation across essential energy services. Yet relatively little is known about the forms this persistence takes and how they differ across energy-transition contexts. Using nationally representative household data from Tanzania and Vietnam from 2008 to 2020, we examine these patterns through a multidimensional energy poverty index. We assess changes in the incidence, intensity, dimensions, and distribution of energy poverty, estimate household-level correlates using Tobit and Logit models, and apply an Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition to the cross-country energy-deprivation gap. Energy poverty declined substantially in both countries, but persistence differed markedly. Tanzania exhibited broad persistence, with deprivation remaining widespread and severe despite major gains in electricity access, while Vietnam exhibited more residual and concentrated persistence following a rapid decline in aggregate energy poverty. Unclean cooking fuels remained the most persistent deprivation in both countries. Income, education, urban residence, and non-farm employment were associated with lower energy deprivation, while farming was associated with greater deprivation. Observable household characteristics accounted for 27.4% of the cross-country gap, indicating that differences in socioeconomic endowments alone do not account for the contrasting outcomes. Policy responses should therefore distinguish electrification from clean-cooking transitions and adapt targeting to the form of persistence. This requires broad multidimensional interventions where deprivation remains widespread and targeted support where it is residual and concentrated, particularly among rural and consumption-poor households and for persistent cooking deprivation.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 141
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), University of Malta (MT), Vietnam National University of Forestry (VN)
No poverty, Reduced inequalities, Affordable and clean energy, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon