Virtual Reality–Based Subjective Visual Vertical Testing: A Scoping Review of Measurement Methods

Virtual reality–based subjective visual vertical (VR-SVV) testing is a portable method for assessing verticality perception relative to gravity, but its protocols remain inconsistent. This scoping review examined the basic VR-SVV outcomes, reliability, validity, and implementation of head-mounted display–based VR-SVV testing in healthy adults. Six databases and two trial registries were searched through 14 January 2025 and updated on 8 July 2026. Twenty-seven studies involving 1289 participants and 12 VR-SVV systems were included. Protocols comprised static upright, head-tilt, dynamic-background, and study-specific paradigms. Group-level static upright values ranged from −1.58° to 2.2°, within the commonly used ±2.5° SVV reference range. However, 2.1–13.3% of participants had signed mean values outside the ±2.5° reference range. Six studies reported reliability for static upright testing using intraclass correlation coefficients (0.38–0.85), including within-session repeatability; five reported standard errors of measurement and minimal detectable changes; and six performed Bland–Altman analyses. Head-tilt results varied widely across studies, while differences in protocols and calculation methods limited comparisons of both head-tilt and dynamic SVV results. VR-induced symptoms were reported mainly during dynamic or demanding protocols. VR-SVV appears feasible and potentially useful; however, standardized procedures, outcomes, reference values, and adverse-event reporting are still required to enable reliable comparisons across systems and populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Imaging
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging12110531
Primary Topic
Vestibular and auditory disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Virtual Reality–Based Subjective Visual Vertical Testing: A Scoping Review of Measurement Methods

Tameto Naoi, Jun Watanabe, Mitsuya Morita, Keisuke Hamada
Journal of Imaging
Vestibular and auditory disorders
article

Virtual Reality–Based Subjective Visual Vertical Testing: A Scoping Review of Measurement Methods

Tameto Naoi, Jun Watanabe, Mitsuya Morita, Keisuke Hamada
article en

Abstract

Virtual reality–based subjective visual vertical (VR-SVV) testing is a portable method for assessing verticality perception relative to gravity, but its protocols remain inconsistent. This scoping review examined the basic VR-SVV outcomes, reliability, validity, and implementation of head-mounted display–based VR-SVV testing in healthy adults. Six databases and two trial registries were searched through 14 January 2025 and updated on 8 July 2026. Twenty-seven studies involving 1289 participants and 12 VR-SVV systems were included. Protocols comprised static upright, head-tilt, dynamic-background, and study-specific paradigms. Group-level static upright values ranged from −1.58° to 2.2°, within the commonly used ±2.5° SVV reference range. However, 2.1–13.3% of participants had signed mean values outside the ±2.5° reference range. Six studies reported reliability for static upright testing using intraclass correlation coefficients (0.38–0.85), including within-session repeatability; five reported standard errors of measurement and minimal detectable changes; and six performed Bland–Altman analyses. Head-tilt results varied widely across studies, while differences in protocols and calculation methods limited comparisons of both head-tilt and dynamic SVV results. VR-induced symptoms were reported mainly during dynamic or demanding protocols. VR-SVV appears feasible and potentially useful; however, standardized procedures, outcomes, reference values, and adverse-event reporting are still required to enable reliable comparisons across systems and populations.

Journal of ImagingVol. 12(11)
Jichi Medical University (JP), Jichi Medical University Hospital (JP), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Vestibular and auditory disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Virtual Reality–Based Subjective Visual Vertical Testing: A Scoping Review of Measurement Methods — Tameto Naoi, Jun Watanabe, et al. · Journal of Imaging (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS