Facial recognition technology in law enforcement: balancing security and the right to privacy

Facial Recognition Technology has rapidly emerged as a powerful tool in modern law enforcement, enabling efficient identification, surveillance, and crime prevention. However, its widespread deployment raises significant concerns regarding the protection of the right to privacy and other fundamental human rights. This paper examines the tension between state interests in ensuring public safety and the individual’s right to informational self-determination. It critically analyzes the legal and constitutional framework governing surveillance, with particular reference to the recognition of privacy as a fundamental right in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India. The study further explores issues of proportionality, necessity, and accountability in the use of FRT, highlighting risks such as mass surveillance, data misuse, and algorithmic bias. It argues for a robust regulatory framework that ensures transparency, safeguards civil liberties, and harmonizes technological advancement with human rights principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Passagens Revista Internacional de História Política e Cultura Jurídica
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15175/dcmy3d24
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facial recognition technology in law enforcement: balancing security and the right to privacy

Hifajatali Sayyed
Passagens Revista Internacional de História Política e Cultura Jurídica
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
article

Facial recognition technology in law enforcement: balancing security and the right to privacy

Hifajatali Sayyed
article en

Abstract

Facial Recognition Technology has rapidly emerged as a powerful tool in modern law enforcement, enabling efficient identification, surveillance, and crime prevention. However, its widespread deployment raises significant concerns regarding the protection of the right to privacy and other fundamental human rights. This paper examines the tension between state interests in ensuring public safety and the individual’s right to informational self-determination. It critically analyzes the legal and constitutional framework governing surveillance, with particular reference to the recognition of privacy as a fundamental right in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India. The study further explores issues of proportionality, necessity, and accountability in the use of FRT, highlighting risks such as mass surveillance, data misuse, and algorithmic bias. It argues for a robust regulatory framework that ensures transparency, safeguards civil liberties, and harmonizes technological advancement with human rights principles.

Passagens Revista Internacional de História Política e Cultura JurídicaVol. 18(3)
Maharashtra National Law University Mumbai (IN), Maharashtra National Law University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Facial recognition technology in law enforcement: balancing security and the right to privacy — Hifajatali Sayyed · Passagens Revista Internacional de História Política e Cultura Jurídica (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS