Can Self-Supervised Probabilistic Representations Improve Image Reconstruction?

What image information remains recoverable from a probabilistic model pretrained through non-contrastive self-supervision without pixel reconstruction? Our experiments show that decoding its frozen representations recovers visual information, although pixel fidelity remains below that of conventional variational autoencoders (VAEs). We subsequently compare fine-tuning a VAE encoder initialized from this self-supervised model with training a separate VAE whose prior is the same model's frozen image-conditioned distribution over latent codes (posterior distillation). Fine-tuning improves pixel fidelity over frozen decoding and conventional VAEs but reduces class separability relative to the frozen self-supervised model. Across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet, posterior distillation improves perceptual similarity, raises peak signal-to-noise ratio by 0.31–0.66 dB, and increases linear classification accuracy over conventional VAEs. Cross-dataset experiments show that the reconstruction benefit extends beyond the pretraining dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23682064
Primary Topic
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Can Self-Supervised Probabilistic Representations Improve Image Reconstruction?

Paul Fieguth, Amin Oji
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
preprint

Can Self-Supervised Probabilistic Representations Improve Image Reconstruction?

Paul Fieguth, Amin Oji
preprint en

Abstract

What image information remains recoverable from a probabilistic model pretrained through non-contrastive self-supervision without pixel reconstruction? Our experiments show that decoding its frozen representations recovers visual information, although pixel fidelity remains below that of conventional variational autoencoders (VAEs). We subsequently compare fine-tuning a VAE encoder initialized from this self-supervised model with training a separate VAE whose prior is the same model's frozen image-conditioned distribution over latent codes (posterior distillation). Fine-tuning improves pixel fidelity over frozen decoding and conventional VAEs but reduces class separability relative to the frozen self-supervised model. Across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet, posterior distillation improves perceptual similarity, raises peak signal-to-noise ratio by 0.31–0.66 dB, and increases linear classification accuracy over conventional VAEs. Cross-dataset experiments show that the reconstruction benefit extends beyond the pretraining dataset.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Waterloo (CA)
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon