Comparative digestive function and starch digestion kinetics in broilers and pigs

Abstract This study compared starch digestion dynamics in broilers and pigs. Seven replicates of two broilers (24-d-old) and one pig (50-d-old) each were fed the same maize-based pelleted diet for 10 d, containing both solid (TiO 2 ) and liquid (Cr-EDTA) markers. After 5 h of fasting, animals had 1 h of feed access before being euthanised at 2, 4, 6 and 8 h post-feeding. Digesta was collected from all pre-caecal segments. Jejunum and ileum combined were cut into four equal parts (SI1–4). Broilers had a heavier anterior tract and longer small intestine (SI) relative to live weight ( P < 0·05), lower gizzard pH than the pig stomach ( P < 0·05) and higher digesta DM. Duodenal digesta of broilers had a greater volume of particles <0·2 mm than pigs ( P < 0·05). Apparent starch digestibility was higher in SI1–SI3 of broilers ( P < 0·05), indicating more rapid starch digestion than pigs, although both species achieved similar digestibility (about 0·98) in SI4. Marker passage was unaffected by marker type but differed between species. Pigs showed higher proportion of markers exiting the anterior tract at 8 h ( P < 0·05) and tended ( P < 0·1) to have greater passage out of the SI, suggesting a more continuous flow pattern than broilers. Interval-based analysis showed similar marker passage out of the SI during 0–2 h, after which broilers had a pulsatile pattern, with reduced passage from 2 to 4 h, increased passage from 4 to 6 h and again lower passage from 6to 8 h ( P < 0·05). In conclusion, broilers and pigs can attain comparable starch digestibility but rely on different kinetics and physiological mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal Of Nutrition
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114526108708
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative digestive function and starch digestion kinetics in broilers and pigs

Aaron J. Cowieson, Lucas Schmidt Bassi, Birger Svihus, Sebastian Andrzej Kaczmarek
1 links
British Journal Of Nutrition
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

Comparative digestive function and starch digestion kinetics in broilers and pigs

Aaron J. Cowieson, Lucas Schmidt Bassi, Birger Svihus, Sebastian Andrzej Kaczmarek
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study compared starch digestion dynamics in broilers and pigs. Seven replicates of two broilers (24-d-old) and one pig (50-d-old) each were fed the same maize-based pelleted diet for 10 d, containing both solid (TiO 2 ) and liquid (Cr-EDTA) markers. After 5 h of fasting, animals had 1 h of feed access before being euthanised at 2, 4, 6 and 8 h post-feeding. Digesta was collected from all pre-caecal segments. Jejunum and ileum combined were cut into four equal parts (SI1–4). Broilers had a heavier anterior tract and longer small intestine (SI) relative to live weight ( P < 0·05), lower gizzard pH than the pig stomach ( P < 0·05) and higher digesta DM. Duodenal digesta of broilers had a greater volume of particles <0·2 mm than pigs ( P < 0·05). Apparent starch digestibility was higher in SI1–SI3 of broilers ( P < 0·05), indicating more rapid starch digestion than pigs, although both species achieved similar digestibility (about 0·98) in SI4. Marker passage was unaffected by marker type but differed between species. Pigs showed higher proportion of markers exiting the anterior tract at 8 h ( P < 0·05) and tended ( P < 0·1) to have greater passage out of the SI, suggesting a more continuous flow pattern than broilers. Interval-based analysis showed similar marker passage out of the SI during 0–2 h, after which broilers had a pulsatile pattern, with reduced passage from 2 to 4 h, increased passage from 4 to 6 h and again lower passage from 6to 8 h ( P < 0·05). In conclusion, broilers and pigs can attain comparable starch digestibility but rely on different kinetics and physiological mechanisms.

British Journal Of Nutrition
Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO), University of Life Sciences in Poznań (PL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon