The Commodification of Intimacy Goes High Tech: Dating Applications and Matchmaking Agencies in Seoul

Online dating applications appear to offer the potential to disrupt inequalities in romantic partner selection by expanding access beyond existing social networks. Yet despite South Korea’s extensive digital infrastructure and widespread internet use, mainstream adoption has remained surprisingly limited. This article examines why dating applications failed to transform courtship within one of the world’s most digitally connected societies. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in Seoul, including participant observation, digital ethnography using Tinder, 41 semi structured interviews, 9 focus groups, three online surveys totaling 1247 responses, and observations of 274 couples in public dating spaces, this study examines the uneven adoption of dating applications and commercial matchmaking agencies. Dating applications remained unpopular among mainstream informants, who generally preferred vetted introductions through existing social networks, while individuals with fewer such opportunities for meeting partners were more likely to adopt what was perceived as risky. Commercial matchmaking agencies, by contrast, attracted clients by evaluating education, occupation, income, appearance, and family background. Rather than transforming South Korea’s intimate marketplace, digital technologies became incorporated into an already commodified landscape of courtship in which existing inequalities continued to shape partner selection. These findings suggest that new technologies become embedded within existing political economic systems rather than disrupting the commodification of intimacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15110738
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Commodification of Intimacy Goes High Tech: Dating Applications and Matchmaking Agencies in Seoul

Edward James Glayzer
Social Sciences
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

The Commodification of Intimacy Goes High Tech: Dating Applications and Matchmaking Agencies in Seoul

Edward James Glayzer
article en

Abstract

Online dating applications appear to offer the potential to disrupt inequalities in romantic partner selection by expanding access beyond existing social networks. Yet despite South Korea’s extensive digital infrastructure and widespread internet use, mainstream adoption has remained surprisingly limited. This article examines why dating applications failed to transform courtship within one of the world’s most digitally connected societies. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in Seoul, including participant observation, digital ethnography using Tinder, 41 semi structured interviews, 9 focus groups, three online surveys totaling 1247 responses, and observations of 274 couples in public dating spaces, this study examines the uneven adoption of dating applications and commercial matchmaking agencies. Dating applications remained unpopular among mainstream informants, who generally preferred vetted introductions through existing social networks, while individuals with fewer such opportunities for meeting partners were more likely to adopt what was perceived as risky. Commercial matchmaking agencies, by contrast, attracted clients by evaluating education, occupation, income, appearance, and family background. Rather than transforming South Korea’s intimate marketplace, digital technologies became incorporated into an already commodified landscape of courtship in which existing inequalities continued to shape partner selection. These findings suggest that new technologies become embedded within existing political economic systems rather than disrupting the commodification of intimacy.

Social SciencesVol. 15(11)
University of Dayton (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon