Scenario-Contextualized Short-Horizon Electricity Demand Forecasting for Istanbul: A Multi-Model Assessment for Emergency Power-System Planning

Major earthquakes can simultaneously interrupt routine electricity use and concentrate emergency-service requirements. This study reports a 22-method retrospective comparison of short-horizon hourly electricity-demand forecasting for Istanbul in a hypothetical Mw 7.5 disaster-information context. The Istanbul hourly electricity-demand series was obtained from EPİAŞ for the period 1 January 2020–1 January 2025 and is retained in the author-supplied workbook, which contains 43,968 records, including 96 repeated timestamps. The historical demand observations were used directly; no national-to-Istanbul scaling by 0.15 was applied. No earthquake-induced load reduction or critical-load increment is independently documented in the target. For the 24 h of 1 January 2025, the archival LSTM predictions yield MAE 79.89 MWh, RMSE 104.01 MWh, R2 approximately 0.97 and MAPE 1.65%. A separate information-removal experiment has a full-feature reference MAE of 666.2882 MWh; its RMSE–R2 relationship is compatible with an 8794 h historical holdout rather than the 24 h local comparison. Nine California/CAISO forecast series were reconciled on 24 common target observations; Random Forest had the lowest error (MAE 661.89 MWh; R2 0.7220), whereas the TensorFlow neural additive method was less accurate. An independently developed chronology-controlled demand-only study is also reported separately. The analyses quantify forecast errors, not observed earthquake effects, network adequacy, or validated operational restoration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19215110
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scenario-Contextualized Short-Horizon Electricity Demand Forecasting for Istanbul: A Multi-Model Assessment for Emergency Power-System Planning

Hüseyin Aydilek, Evrencan Özcan, Ayşe Ceyda BAŞAR
1 links
Energies
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
article

Scenario-Contextualized Short-Horizon Electricity Demand Forecasting for Istanbul: A Multi-Model Assessment for Emergency Power-System Planning

Hüseyin Aydilek, Evrencan Özcan, Ayşe Ceyda BAŞAR
article en

Abstract

Major earthquakes can simultaneously interrupt routine electricity use and concentrate emergency-service requirements. This study reports a 22-method retrospective comparison of short-horizon hourly electricity-demand forecasting for Istanbul in a hypothetical Mw 7.5 disaster-information context. The Istanbul hourly electricity-demand series was obtained from EPİAŞ for the period 1 January 2020–1 January 2025 and is retained in the author-supplied workbook, which contains 43,968 records, including 96 repeated timestamps. The historical demand observations were used directly; no national-to-Istanbul scaling by 0.15 was applied. No earthquake-induced load reduction or critical-load increment is independently documented in the target. For the 24 h of 1 January 2025, the archival LSTM predictions yield MAE 79.89 MWh, RMSE 104.01 MWh, R2 approximately 0.97 and MAPE 1.65%. A separate information-removal experiment has a full-feature reference MAE of 666.2882 MWh; its RMSE–R2 relationship is compatible with an 8794 h historical holdout rather than the 24 h local comparison. Nine California/CAISO forecast series were reconciled on 24 common target observations; Random Forest had the lowest error (MAE 661.89 MWh; R2 0.7220), whereas the TensorFlow neural additive method was less accurate. An independently developed chronology-controlled demand-only study is also reported separately. The analyses quantify forecast errors, not observed earthquake effects, network adequacy, or validated operational restoration.

EnergiesVol. 19(21)
Kırıkkale University (TR)
Affordable and clean energy, Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Climate action, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon