Development and Psychometric Evaluation of Two Scales Assessing Food Allergy Attitudes and Practices Among Food and Beverage Employees: A Preliminary Study

This study aimed to develop two instruments assessing food allergy attitudes and practices among food and beverage employees and to evaluate their psychometric properties. A methodological design was used with 110 employees of a hotel food and beverage department in Beyoğlu, İstanbul. Items were generated from the literature and revised based on expert opinion. Construct validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and reliability using Cronbach’s alpha and item–total correlations. The 13-item Attitude Towards Food Allergies Scale showed a four-factor structure explaining 69.18% of the variance (KMO = 0.787; α = 0.811). The 12-item Food Allergy Practices Scale showed a three-factor structure explaining 65.29% of the variance (KMO = 0.818; α = 0.818). Some subscales consisting of two or three items showed low internal consistency and should be interpreted with caution. Mean scores were 40.19 ± 6.43 (attitude; range 0–52) and 21.29 ± 3.47 (practice; range 0–24). Attitude and practice scores were moderately and positively correlated (r = 0.436, p < 0.001). Both scales demonstrated acceptable preliminary validity and reliability for assessing food allergy attitudes and practices in food service settings; confirmatory studies in larger and more diverse samples are recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foods
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15213824
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of Two Scales Assessing Food Allergy Attitudes and Practices Among Food and Beverage Employees: A Preliminary Study

Berrak Altınsoy, Arda Öztürkcan, Hasret Gülüş Oymak, Hüseyin Gonce
Foods
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
article

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of Two Scales Assessing Food Allergy Attitudes and Practices Among Food and Beverage Employees: A Preliminary Study

Berrak Altınsoy, Arda Öztürkcan, Hasret Gülüş Oymak, Hüseyin Gonce
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to develop two instruments assessing food allergy attitudes and practices among food and beverage employees and to evaluate their psychometric properties. A methodological design was used with 110 employees of a hotel food and beverage department in Beyoğlu, İstanbul. Items were generated from the literature and revised based on expert opinion. Construct validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and reliability using Cronbach’s alpha and item–total correlations. The 13-item Attitude Towards Food Allergies Scale showed a four-factor structure explaining 69.18% of the variance (KMO = 0.787; α = 0.811). The 12-item Food Allergy Practices Scale showed a three-factor structure explaining 65.29% of the variance (KMO = 0.818; α = 0.818). Some subscales consisting of two or three items showed low internal consistency and should be interpreted with caution. Mean scores were 40.19 ± 6.43 (attitude; range 0–52) and 21.29 ± 3.47 (practice; range 0–24). Attitude and practice scores were moderately and positively correlated (r = 0.436, p < 0.001). Both scales demonstrated acceptable preliminary validity and reliability for assessing food allergy attitudes and practices in food service settings; confirmatory studies in larger and more diverse samples are recommended.

FoodsVol. 15(21)
İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi (TR), Okan University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon