Quantifying Biomechanical Demand During Manual Overboard Rescue: Scenario-Based Application of the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation

BackgroundMaritime first responders frequently perform manual overboard lifting during rescue operations, placing them at high risk for musculoskeletal injury, particularly in the lumbar spine. Conventional ergonomic guidelines, including the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Lifting Equation (RNLE), were developed for controlled, symmetrical lifting and do not adequately capture the biomechanical and environmental demands of overboard recovery.PurposeThis study aimed to quantify biomechanical demand during overboard lifting from vessels with 1.8- to 3.0-m freeboard and to evaluate injury risk under conditions exceeding standard RNLE assumptions.MethodsThe RNLE was adapted to estimate Recommended Weight Limit (RWL) and Lifting Index (LI) for overboard lifting tasks. Scenario-based analyses examined object masses (0-140 kg), horizontal reaches (25-50 cm), and vertical lifting distances (0-175 cm). LI values were calculated at both lift origin and destination to capture phase-specific biomechanical risk.ResultsUnder idealized conditions, LI exceeded the recommended safety threshold (LI > 1) at loads as low as 15.6 kg for a horizontal reach of 25 cm. For a human-sized load of 90 kg, LI ranged from 3.9 to 7.8 depending on horizontal reach and vertical displacement, indicating substantial biomechanical overload. Increasing horizontal reach from 25 to 50 cm increased LI by 40 to 60% across all load conditions. LI exceeded 1 at both the lift origin and destination for all modeled loads ≥20 kg and vertical displacements ≥50 cm, highlighting the elevated risk inherent in these tasks.ConclusionManual overboard lifting imposes significant biomechanical strain that frequently exceeds conventional ergonomic limits. Task-specific metrics derived here provide quantitative guidance for injury prevention, including pre-employment functional screening, progressive task-specific conditioning, and the use of mechanical assistive devices. These findings support evidence-based occupational health strategies for maritime first responders and other personnel performing high-risk lifting tasks in dynamic environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032261500121
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Biomechanical Demand During Manual Overboard Rescue: Scenario-Based Application of the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation

Yair Barzilay, Ram Haddas, Andréas Remis, Prasanth Romiyo et al.
1 links
Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
Occupational Health and Performance
article

Quantifying Biomechanical Demand During Manual Overboard Rescue: Scenario-Based Application of the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation

Yair Barzilay, Ram Haddas, Andréas Remis, Prasanth Romiyo, Ye Shu, Tyler Schmidt
article en

Abstract

BackgroundMaritime first responders frequently perform manual overboard lifting during rescue operations, placing them at high risk for musculoskeletal injury, particularly in the lumbar spine. Conventional ergonomic guidelines, including the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Lifting Equation (RNLE), were developed for controlled, symmetrical lifting and do not adequately capture the biomechanical and environmental demands of overboard recovery.PurposeThis study aimed to quantify biomechanical demand during overboard lifting from vessels with 1.8- to 3.0-m freeboard and to evaluate injury risk under conditions exceeding standard RNLE assumptions.MethodsThe RNLE was adapted to estimate Recommended Weight Limit (RWL) and Lifting Index (LI) for overboard lifting tasks. Scenario-based analyses examined object masses (0-140 kg), horizontal reaches (25-50 cm), and vertical lifting distances (0-175 cm). LI values were calculated at both lift origin and destination to capture phase-specific biomechanical risk.ResultsUnder idealized conditions, LI exceeded the recommended safety threshold (LI > 1) at loads as low as 15.6 kg for a horizontal reach of 25 cm. For a human-sized load of 90 kg, LI ranged from 3.9 to 7.8 depending on horizontal reach and vertical displacement, indicating substantial biomechanical overload. Increasing horizontal reach from 25 to 50 cm increased LI by 40 to 60% across all load conditions. LI exceeded 1 at both the lift origin and destination for all modeled loads ≥20 kg and vertical displacements ≥50 cm, highlighting the elevated risk inherent in these tasks.ConclusionManual overboard lifting imposes significant biomechanical strain that frequently exceeds conventional ergonomic limits. Task-specific metrics derived here provide quantitative guidance for injury prevention, including pre-employment functional screening, progressive task-specific conditioning, and the use of mechanical assistive devices. These findings support evidence-based occupational health strategies for maritime first responders and other personnel performing high-risk lifting tasks in dynamic environments.

Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
Duke University (US), Shaare Zedek Medical Center (IL), Bikur Cholim Hospital (IL), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), Duke University Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Occupational Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon